Difference between revisions of "Talk:List of Neopet redesigns"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:Well, it seemed logical to condense them into one... Maybe a name like 'The Darwin Project'? ;). Yeah, I think renaming the article would be the best thing to do. --[[User:Macbeth|Macbeth]] 11:36, 28 May 2006 (CDT) | :Well, it seemed logical to condense them into one... Maybe a name like 'The Darwin Project'? ;). Yeah, I think renaming the article would be the best thing to do. --[[User:Macbeth|Macbeth]] 11:36, 28 May 2006 (CDT) | ||
So a rename is in order...hmmm...how about "character Redesigns" or something? And will items/petpets be included?--[[User:Jacob|Jacob]] 11:50, 28 May 2006 (CDT) | So a rename is in order...hmmm...how about "character Redesigns" or something? And will items/petpets be included?--[[User:Jacob|Jacob]] 11:50, 28 May 2006 (CDT) | ||
:PetPets certainly, since they are... you know... Petful. Items, though, I think a separate article would be best. Do you understand the distinction I am trying to make? Petpets and Neopets are characters, whereas items have no implication of sentience (usually :P). 'Character Redesigns' sounds good to me... Or 'Neopets Redesigns', 'neopets' being the site rather than the pets? --[[User:Macbeth|Macbeth]] 12:08, 28 May 2006 (CDT) | |||
==Redirects== | ==Redirects== | ||
At the moment, old pet names (Fuzio, JibJib, etc) redirect to the current pet version's entry. Should we make them redirect here? --[[User:Macbeth|Macbeth]] 11:36, 28 May 2006 (CDT) | At the moment, old pet names (Fuzio, JibJib, etc) redirect to the current pet version's entry. Should we make them redirect here? --[[User:Macbeth|Macbeth]] 11:36, 28 May 2006 (CDT) | ||
: Yes, having them redirect here would be good. as soon as we figure out the name of this article (and other articles if there are going to be), as there are item/petpet names to consider as well.--[[User:Jacob|Jacob]] 11:50, 28 May 2006 (CDT) | : Yes, having them redirect here would be good. as soon as we figure out the name of this article (and other articles if there are going to be), as there are item/petpet names to consider as well.--[[User:Jacob|Jacob]] 11:50, 28 May 2006 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 17:08, 28 May 2006
Article Title?
The title is "old neopets", showing the name changes and art changes taken place with all the Neopets. But Petpets were just added, so either the name needs to change to something like "Old Designs of items and pets", or a whole new page needs to be created.--Jacob 11:21, 28 May 2006 (CDT)
- Well, it seemed logical to condense them into one... Maybe a name like 'The Darwin Project'? ;). Yeah, I think renaming the article would be the best thing to do. --Macbeth 11:36, 28 May 2006 (CDT)
So a rename is in order...hmmm...how about "character Redesigns" or something? And will items/petpets be included?--Jacob 11:50, 28 May 2006 (CDT)
- PetPets certainly, since they are... you know... Petful. Items, though, I think a separate article would be best. Do you understand the distinction I am trying to make? Petpets and Neopets are characters, whereas items have no implication of sentience (usually :P). 'Character Redesigns' sounds good to me... Or 'Neopets Redesigns', 'neopets' being the site rather than the pets? --Macbeth 12:08, 28 May 2006 (CDT)
Redirects
At the moment, old pet names (Fuzio, JibJib, etc) redirect to the current pet version's entry. Should we make them redirect here? --Macbeth 11:36, 28 May 2006 (CDT)
- Yes, having them redirect here would be good. as soon as we figure out the name of this article (and other articles if there are going to be), as there are item/petpet names to consider as well.--Jacob 11:50, 28 May 2006 (CDT)