Difference between revisions of "Talk:Lost Desert Plot"

From NeoDex
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(something to work on and think about)
Line 9: Line 9:
It'd be easier to tag or rewrite the entire article. Theres barely a sentence thats pure fact. --[[User:80.42.176.151|80.42.176.151]]
It'd be easier to tag or rewrite the entire article. Theres barely a sentence thats pure fact. --[[User:80.42.176.151|80.42.176.151]]
*Will try and edit it over in time and make everything as clean and factual in time. my promise on that.--[[User:Jacob|Jacob]] 17:06, 3 Mar 2006 (CST)
*Will try and edit it over in time and make everything as clean and factual in time. my promise on that.--[[User:Jacob|Jacob]] 17:06, 3 Mar 2006 (CST)
**Aye... I already removed the signature of the original author...

Revision as of 23:12, 3 March 2006

The "Plot" page

seeing as this is a "plot" page, i feel it should be noted there have been more plots in the Lost Deser than this. Dr. Frank Sloth invaded once, the crown of Coltzan was stolen, and there was a dinner party as well (prizes being the now coveted...maybe...battle scarabs). so, do we have them all be seperate pages? or all on this one page?--Jacob 17:06, 3 Mar 2006 (CST)

Biased Article

In every wiki I have seen, articles are expected to be unbiased. Wiki's are places for facts, not opinions. Is this wiki the same? As this article is completely opinionised, rather than factual. not everyone who completed the plot wished they never started, many enjoyed it, and there is no proof that only a few hundred finished. --~

Try to keep things as factual as possible. If there are statements that aren't proven, then tagg them as such. --138.217.90.100 18:25, 17 Dec 2005 (CST)

It'd be easier to tag or rewrite the entire article. Theres barely a sentence thats pure fact. --80.42.176.151

  • Will try and edit it over in time and make everything as clean and factual in time. my promise on that.--Jacob 17:06, 3 Mar 2006 (CST)
    • Aye... I already removed the signature of the original author...