Difference between revisions of "Talk:Lost Desert Plot"
m (Talk:Lost Desert Plot moved to Talk:Woooooosh) |
m (knock down section levels to standard) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=The "Plot" page= | ==The "Plot" page== | ||
seeing as this is a "plot" page, i feel it should be noted there have been more plots in the Lost Deser than this. [[Dr. Frank Sloth]] invaded once, the crown of Coltzan was stolen, and there was a dinner party as well (prizes being the now coveted...maybe...battle scarabs). so, do we have them all be seperate pages? or all on this one page?--[[User:Jacob|Jacob]] 17:06, 3 Mar 2006 (CST) | seeing as this is a "plot" page, i feel it should be noted there have been more plots in the Lost Deser than this. [[Dr. Frank Sloth]] invaded once, the crown of Coltzan was stolen, and there was a dinner party as well (prizes being the now coveted...maybe...battle scarabs). so, do we have them all be seperate pages? or all on this one page?--[[User:Jacob|Jacob]] 17:06, 3 Mar 2006 (CST) | ||
=Biased Article= | ==Biased Article== | ||
In every wiki I have seen, articles are expected to be unbiased. Wiki's are places for facts, not opinions. Is this wiki the same? As this article is completely opinionised, rather than factual. not everyone who completed the plot wished they never started, many enjoyed it, and there is no proof that only a few hundred finished. --~ | In every wiki I have seen, articles are expected to be unbiased. Wiki's are places for facts, not opinions. Is this wiki the same? As this article is completely opinionised, rather than factual. not everyone who completed the plot wished they never started, many enjoyed it, and there is no proof that only a few hundred finished. --~ | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
*Will try and edit it over in time and make everything as clean and factual in time. my promise on that.--[[User:Jacob|Jacob]] 17:06, 3 Mar 2006 (CST) | *Will try and edit it over in time and make everything as clean and factual in time. my promise on that.--[[User:Jacob|Jacob]] 17:06, 3 Mar 2006 (CST) | ||
**Aye... I already removed the signature of the original author... --[[User:Duke of Earl|Duke of Earl]] 23:12, 3 Mar 2006 | **Aye... I already removed the signature of the original author... --[[User:Duke of Earl|Duke of Earl]] 23:12, 3 Mar 2006 | ||
== Edited lede == | |||
I tried to copyedit the lede, but, not having participated in any major way in LDP, I'm not sure about some of the things in there. (I have a hunch that a few sentences are part of the biases mentioned in the previous section.) There probably needs to be some more fixes. [[User:AySz88|AySz88]] 22:11, 1 January 2011 (CST) | |||
Latest revision as of 04:11, 2 January 2011
The "Plot" page[edit]
seeing as this is a "plot" page, i feel it should be noted there have been more plots in the Lost Deser than this. Dr. Frank Sloth invaded once, the crown of Coltzan was stolen, and there was a dinner party as well (prizes being the now coveted...maybe...battle scarabs). so, do we have them all be seperate pages? or all on this one page?--Jacob 17:06, 3 Mar 2006 (CST)
Biased Article[edit]
In every wiki I have seen, articles are expected to be unbiased. Wiki's are places for facts, not opinions. Is this wiki the same? As this article is completely opinionised, rather than factual. not everyone who completed the plot wished they never started, many enjoyed it, and there is no proof that only a few hundred finished. --~
Try to keep things as factual as possible. If there are statements that aren't proven, then tagg them as such. --138.217.90.100 18:25, 17 Dec 2005 (CST)
It'd be easier to tag or rewrite the entire article. Theres barely a sentence thats pure fact. --80.42.176.151
- Will try and edit it over in time and make everything as clean and factual in time. my promise on that.--Jacob 17:06, 3 Mar 2006 (CST)
- Aye... I already removed the signature of the original author... --Duke of Earl 23:12, 3 Mar 2006
Edited lede[edit]
I tried to copyedit the lede, but, not having participated in any major way in LDP, I'm not sure about some of the things in there. (I have a hunch that a few sentences are part of the biases mentioned in the previous section.) There probably needs to be some more fixes. AySz88 22:11, 1 January 2011 (CST)