Difference between revisions of "Talk:Lost Desert Plot"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=Biased Article= | =Biased Article= | ||
In every wiki I have seen, articles are expected to be unbiased. Wiki's are places for facts, not opinions. Is this wiki the same? As this article is completely opinionised, rather than factual. not everyone who completed the plot wished they never started, many enjoyed it, and there is no proof that only a few hundred finished. | In every wiki I have seen, articles are expected to be unbiased. Wiki's are places for facts, not opinions. Is this wiki the same? As this article is completely opinionised, rather than factual. not everyone who completed the plot wished they never started, many enjoyed it, and there is no proof that only a few hundred finished. --~ | ||
Try to keep things as factual as possible. If there are statements that aren't proven, then tagg them as such. --[[User:138.217.90.100|138.217.90.100]] 18:25, 17 Dec 2005 (CST) | Try to keep things as factual as possible. If there are statements that aren't proven, then tagg them as such. --[[User:138.217.90.100|138.217.90.100]] 18:25, 17 Dec 2005 (CST) | ||
It'd be easier to tag or rewrite the entire article. Theres barely a sentence thats pure fact. --[[User:80.42.176.151|80.42.176.151]] | |||
Revision as of 04:24, 21 December 2005
Biased Article
In every wiki I have seen, articles are expected to be unbiased. Wiki's are places for facts, not opinions. Is this wiki the same? As this article is completely opinionised, rather than factual. not everyone who completed the plot wished they never started, many enjoyed it, and there is no proof that only a few hundred finished. --~
Try to keep things as factual as possible. If there are statements that aren't proven, then tagg them as such. --138.217.90.100 18:25, 17 Dec 2005 (CST)
It'd be easier to tag or rewrite the entire article. Theres barely a sentence thats pure fact. --80.42.176.151