Destroy All Humans (it's a game don't panic)

Bangel · **Posted:** Wed Jul 06, 2005 2:04 pm

sir_michael wrote:

Bangel wrote:

sir_michael wrote:

Bangel wrote:

Ammer wrote:

It looks like a moronic game. It has bad graphics and the name just spells out stupid.

Yep.

Bad Graphics? I beg to differ, it is some of the best graphics I have ever seen on the PS2, but I do see how you can think the game is moronic.

In my opinion, good graphics are things that seem realistic. From seeing the previews, it just doesn't look realistic at all to me.

I see. I thought the explosions looked very nice, it had good effects, the alien, his saucer and his weapons looked great. I think that this game has some of the best effects for the PS2, but, the level design, and some of the modeling could've used some work.

So, you like realistic graphics, like Half-Life 2, or Doom 3. You don't like the cartoony graphics of Ratchet and Clank or the cel-shading of Sly 2?

Nah. Cartoony things never did much for me. I like the real thing.

sir_michael · **Posted:** Wed Jul 06, 2005 2:16 pm

Bangel wrote:

sir_michael wrote:

Bangel wrote:

sir_michael wrote:

Bangel wrote:

Ammer wrote:

It looks like a moronic game. It has bad graphics and the name just spells out stupid.

Yep.

Bad Graphics? I beg to differ, it is some of the best graphics I have ever seen on the PS2, but I do see how you can think the game is moronic.

In my opinion, good graphics are things that seem realistic. From seeing the previews, it just doesn't look realistic at all to me.

I see. I thought the explosions looked very nice, it had good effects, the alien, his saucer and his weapons looked great. I think that this game has some of the best effects for the PS2, but, the level design, and some of the modeling could've used some work.

So, you like realistic graphics, like Half-Life 2, or Doom 3. You don't like the cartoony graphics of Ratchet and Clank or the cel-shading of Sly 2?

Nah. Cartoony things never did much for me. I like the real thing.

Ah.

Btw, what do you think is the best-looking game ever?

Kugetsu · **Posted:** Wed Jul 06, 2005 2:50 pm

Aye... now we measure graphics on how close they are to reality? This game actually has impressive graphics (that's considering that any type of game can have good graphics). I probably wouldn't buy it (rent maybe, but probably not), but I can say from actually seeing the game that the game got good checks on graphics for a reason (an average of about 8 out of 10 I think). Not because they suck. Unfortunately, I'm not much into GTA-type genre (they bore me quickly), but I think this might be a nice alternative to GTA.

Clemson · **Posted:** Mon Jul 25, 2005 11:40 pm

My brother has this game and other than watching him I've played it a few times when he was out of the house. I thought it was pretty fun, I was impressed with the graphics, but it does seem to be pretty repetitive.

nomekop185 · **Posted:** Thu Aug 11, 2005 2:49 pm

Graphics don't determine all, you know.

SSBM had the most cartoonish graphics (Almost babyish) I've seen in quite a while, and it is (Almost by far) the greatest Gamecube Multiplayer out there.

And that isn't all just my opinion, it is confirmed by Gamefaqs, forums etc

The LeaderBean · **Posted:** Fri Sep 23, 2005 4:57 pm

The game is good the first hour you play it but i gets repetitive and you only get 4 guns in the whole game it sucks to me but the comercials looked so cool

Pink Poogle Toy Forum

Destroy All Humans (it's a game don't panic)

Who is online