Pink Poogle Toy Forum

Last Commentary Thread: http://www.pinkpt.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=8090
Gameplay Thread: http://www.pinkpt.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=7621

Anyone can post here, to comment on the last game, or to give Scott feedback by answering the questions below:

FEEDBACK TIME!

1) Do you feel the commentary group should be kept absolutely silent? Or let them post their theories aloud? (Strictly based on THREAD information)

2) The next games WILL be taking place Every day. Will that pose a problem?

3) Did you like this voting style? If not.... how come?

4) Any extra notes you want to say?

The "he" was referring to shaman Kugetsu, I believe.

And Scott? I don't quite understand the quote above. What list are you talking about?

I'm not too surprised. A lot of people didn't think I was an innocent.

Well, except for the Archangel apparently.

1) Do you feel the commentary group should be kept absolutely silent? Or let them post their theories aloud? (Strictly based on THREAD information)

I believe they should be able to post their theories but as long as they do not reveal any secret information, than it should be allowed.


2) The next games WILL be taking place Every day. Will that pose a problem?

It depends. If there is a little amount of people signing up, I suggest every two days would be better. But if there is a large amount of people signing up, I'm all for it.

3) Did you like this voting style? If not.... how come?

Yes, I liked this much better than PMing you the votes.

4) Any extra notes you want to say?

Fun game however more roles should be added!

1) Post theories, of course. If not, ppl like our dear okamoto will kill off all the "smart" people first. It also helps keep dead people involved in the game.

2) Absolutely not. Everyday is better.

3) Umm... I don't mind this, but the PM style has great strategic potential, IMO, and I haven't seen it tried out in a complex game yet. Maybe you could test it out the next game? But I do realise that it may be harder for the MC to sort out all the PMs like that...

4) Erm... more roles and special powers? Hopefully no one will be a plain old innocent.

1) I dont know. IMO it ruined the game because some innocents were listening to dead people in voting. The people who are alive should figure it out on their own.

2) No.

3) Fine with me.

4) More roles

1) Do you feel the commentary group should be kept absolutely silent? Or let them post their theories aloud? (Strictly based on THREAD information)

Nope. It's their opinion....but I dunno. This is probably the reason why people like killling the active people first.

2) The next games WILL be taking place Every day. Will that pose a problem?

Maybe. Maybe not. Except someone who doesn't vote needs an excuse...right?

3) Did you like this voting style? If not.... how come?

Yup.

4) Any extra notes you want to say?

More roles (of course). Haha....people can even have "lives"...wait, nevermind. And don't make the mafia all in one row in the tablet. That's pretty much all.

1. No, keep it as is.

2. No, I'd prefer it like that.

3. Yes, I liked it more.

4. I thought I was the interviewer!

1.) Well, I think the commentary should be left the way it is. I guess it was just luck that led this game to end so that all the living people became dependant on the dead to feed them clues. It seems I was the last one left alive to be helpful in finding out bad guys.

2.) I have no problem with everyday, but maybe allow one more Non-vote before a Mod-kill?

3.) The voting system was swell since you got to analyze how people voted before execution.

4.) Well, you already have more roles in store, so everything is peachy
And to Qanda haha

This should not be a surprise

1. Let the dead talk and post theories based upon public information

2. Every day is fine

3. I do like the public voting style as it involves more strategy. If you use the PM style I think you need to post vote updates frequently (and I know how tough that is for an MC to do)

1) Do you feel the commentary group should be kept absolutely silent? Or let them post their theories aloud? (Strictly based on THREAD information)

Yes - If there was a way to prohibit player's from seeing it, I'd recommend that, but it should be fine as it is.

2) The next games WILL be taking place Every day. Will that pose a problem?

Definitely not.

3) Did you like this voting style? If not.... how come?

This voting style? I like postig the Votes. If we get a large numver of people, 30+, I'd recommend using the 2 executions per night from WW17.

4) Any extra notes you want to say?

A lot of this is upto you, and I trust you. Some of the more complicated rules from WW17 should not be here, but I'd steal most of your ideas from there. For example, the Beloved Prince & the Bus Driver.

Extra useless hurrying from impatient player : Maybe you can start the signups for WW3 already, Scott, since it would take some time to get everyone to sign up. By then you should have finished writing up the roles already.

1) No...theory's should be allowed...but just theory's... no information from when still alive

2) no...not for me anyway..Plus it will be more active if its every day

3) i like it better because it plots seeds of suspicion if your the 1st to vote etc.

4) this was a great game...great job scottnak. And more roles sounds
great!!

EDIT: About ww2...(i wasnt on last night so i couldnt post on commentary)
I knew it!! autumnelf was the last wolf...if i didnt state my suspicion, starchaser would have been executed and i probably would have been mauled and the wolves would have won

Congrats warxelo, you were instrumental in leading to the defeat of the last werewolf.

thank you But you guys made me go after lass (which was a good thing) the night before so the commentary thread helped a lot with executing lass.

Id say that was a come from behind win because the good spirits died way too early and i remember a couple of people saying that the innocents had a slim chance of winning