Talk:Pink Poogle Toy

After reading what up to that point was a good well rounded history I become most confused as to who's side the whole "debate" was being argued from. Sometimes it is best to simply refer to the "whole (GOODNAMEHERE) insident" and go disclaimer of spyware and move on. This is up to you as I have no intention of editing some-one elses history records.

Also when I started reading I thought this was a history of this site but at the end I was unsure what I was reading. I can't even begin to consider taking part in wikiwikiweb on that page without a little more information or I could turn truth to lies by total accident. This is not something I wish to do.

--Lord Matt 05:09, 28 Oct 2005 (CDT)

The whole spywear thing worries me

It sounds like an "OMG I found third party cookies on my PC - I am (a) too dumb to block them or (b) too dumb to know what they are."

Unfortunatly it allso sounds like the response from this end was somewhat OMG I have no real idea what I'm ...etc etc etc

*whaps you on noggin with calming mattet*

okay then. look here. we will figure out how to work this wiki efficiatly in time. heck, i don't like the spam either. i find it very destructive. been working my part to keep it clean. in the meantime, admin powers should be looked over by the proper channels, and how to stop people from placing destructive content on boards and defacing content already placed on wiki pages. *thumbs up*

Biased

Is it just me or this page horrendously biased, in favor of PPT? Just going off memory, it mentions how awesome the admin is, and how loving the community is...etc. Littlemac 02:57, 28 Jul 2006 (CDT)

Already mentioned by Jacob - who says it'll be fixed. The entry was copy pasted from PPT's history article on the main site so there was some content there when the NeoDex first began.--Yukio 10:01, 28 Jul 2006 (CDT)

*falls out of chair* opps!?! :S Yeah, i did say i was going to do that. --Jacob 11:56, 28 Jul 2006 (CDT)