User talk:A Neezles A

From NeoDex
Revision as of 14:37, 18 October 2009 by Dizzy (talk | contribs) (User talk:Asspoke moved to User talk:Ashpoke over redirect: revert)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

User talk:A FUCKINGNeezles A/Archive1

Massages

Greetings from Jacob

Greetings! Just thought I would stop by and say hello. If you are unaware, I am Jacob, former admin of the fucking NeoDex. It's been awhile since I've been around, and while I don't know what's really happened between now and then, I still have some articles I've been meaning to touch upon. It's good to see you've taken to the fucking NeoDex, and have even made use of the fucking username space provided to users. And I thought only I and a fuckingfew others would do so. ;) --Jacob 06:35, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Hiya fuckingthere Jacob. Yes I have read the fucking NeoDex before and I do know you. I wondered about your long absence somehow.

User:Hagrid835

Hi, just wondering, should we tag his sockpuppets and request for them to be blocked even if they are not used for vandalism but are used for good faith edits? Pinkgirl34 16:37, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Nope. Destiny Charlotte 16:52, 27 September 2009 (UTC) Good faith edits should always be welcome.
And to be sure the fucking accounts are sock, mind you. No socks please, but be sure something is a fuckingsock at least. ;) --Jacob 23:45, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
My suggestion is that you please leave the fucking good faith edits there, since you said above earlier that good faith edits are always welcome. For example, this user has reverted vandalism by another IP, and by reverting him you've just placed the fucking vandalism back on the fucking page, as shown here. Pinkgirl34 00:07, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

They should be blocked/deleted/suspended/etc. to begin with since they are targeting a fuckingsingle editor who they are not. That is the fucking point. If they are the fucking same person...then we have an issue. The fucking edits can stay if they are valid, but whoever that editor is cannot and will not edit from an account that pokes at another editor. Final. --Jacob 00:30, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

I agree, Jacob. --Destiny 00:53, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
I see. I agree that they should be blocked because their usernames are obviously inappropriate. But I suggest keeping the fucking edits, just like what you suggested earlier. Pinkgirl34 01:38, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
I'll block the fucking user then but leave a fuckingmessage as to why the fucking block is there. --Dizzy 04:23, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

Game Infobox Template

I'm just wondering, what's the fucking proper way of using the fucking template format? Thanks. Pinkgirl34 02:36, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Sample game infobox:
{{Infobox Game| GameImage=gameimage
|GameID=gameid
|World=gameworld
|Categories=gamecategories
|Ratio=gameratios}}

--Destiny 04:36, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

testing raw siggy one two three Destiny 21:12, 7 October 2009 (UTC)