User talk:A Neezles A

User talk:A Neezles A/Archive1

Massages

Greetings from Jacob

Greetings! Just thought I would stop by and say hello. If you are unaware, I am Jacob, former admin of the friggin goddamn NeoDex. It's been awhile since I've been around, and while I don't know what's really happened between now and then, I still have some articles I've been meaning to touch upon. It's good to see you've taken to the friggin goddamn NeoDex, and have even made use of the friggin goddamn username space provided to users. And I thought only I and a few others would do so. ;) --Jacob 06:35, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Hiya there Jacob. Yes I have read the friggin goddamn NeoDex before and I do know you. I wondered about your long absence somehow.

User:Hagrid835

Hi, just wondering, should we tag his sockpuppets and request for them to be blocked even if they are not used for vandalism but are used for good faith edits? Pinkgirl34 16:37, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Nope. Destiny Charlotte 16:52, 27 September 2009 (UTC) Good faith edits should always be welcome.

And to be sure the friggin goddamn accounts are sock, mind you. No socks please, but be sure something is a sock at least. ;) --Jacob 23:45, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

My suggestion is that you please leave the friggin goddamn good faith edits there, since you said above earlier that good faith edits are always welcome. For example, this user has reverted vandalism by another IP, and by reverting him you've just placed the friggin goddamn vandalism back on the friggin goddamn page, as shown here. Pinkgirl34 00:07, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

They should be blocked/deleted/suspended/etc. to begin with since they are targeting a single editor who they are not. That is the friggin goddamn point. If they are the friggin goddamn same person...then we have an issue. The friggin goddamn edits can stay if they are valid, but whoever that editor is cannot and will not edit from an account that pokes at another editor. Final. --Jacob 00:30, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

I agree, Jacob. --Destiny 00:53, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

I see. I agree that they should be blocked because their usernames are obviously inappropriate. But I suggest keeping the friggin goddamn edits, just like what you suggested earlier. Pinkgirl34 01:38, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

I'll block the friggin goddamn user then but leave a message as to why the friggin goddamn block is there. --Dizzy 04:23, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

Game Infobox Template

I'm just wondering, what's the friggin goddamn proper way of using the friggin goddamn template format? Thanks. Pinkgirl34 02:36, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Sample game infobox:

{{Infobox Game| GameImage=gameimage
|GameID=gameid
|World=gameworld
|Categories=gamecategories
|Ratio=gameratios}}

--Destiny 04:36, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

testing raw siggy one two three Destiny 21:12, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Deletion???

So, it's neopets related, and it's on his own user page... I'm not sure why you felt the friggin goddamn need to delete it. You have lists of random stuff on your user page... -Cath 21:59, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

Those things don't exist though. I'm sorry. Destiny 22:28, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

The friggin goddamn Blue Kacheek Group does exist. Maybe it's his fan-fic. The friggin goddamn links to pages should go, but the friggin goddamn rest is as relevant as you listing your NFs, the friggin goddamn people you hate, and your nicknames. -Cath 23:33, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

I think it has always been policy that a user is free to do on his user page whatever he pleases, as long as he doesn't break any rules (such as, but not limited to: create unnecessary links, uses his page only for advertising, pretend he is another user or a celebrity, use curse words etc...). I agree a clarification is needed, since it isn't written down anywhere.--Demon 00:52, 20 October 2009 (UTC)