Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Construction"
m (Copied over talk page from Template:WhyConstruct) |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:Go right ahead, but if you do plan on doing so please be sure to add the text to each document with it's reason, as it would just be a plank spot on the text area if you didn't. --[[User:Jacob|Jacob]] 19:26, 2 Sep 2006 (CDT) | :Go right ahead, but if you do plan on doing so please be sure to add the text to each document with it's reason, as it would just be a plank spot on the text area if you didn't. --[[User:Jacob|Jacob]] 19:26, 2 Sep 2006 (CDT) | ||
Will do :). --[[User:Macbeth|Macbeth]] 06:02, 3 Sep 2006 (CDT) | Will do :). --[[User:Macbeth|Macbeth]] 06:02, 3 Sep 2006 (CDT) | ||
=="Construction" Template to be absolute?== | |||
I was thinking it would be proper for this template to replace the [[:Category:To Do List|"To Do List"]] and maybe even the [[:Template:Stub|"stubs"]] seen on many articles, as it gives editors a clear why for them to say what they think an article needs to be more complete. What do you think? Should this action be undertaken, one by one all articles with connections said items will be editted accordingly (editted as in added to, and not just switching all things around, which doesn't help that much). Again, wondering what others think. --[[User:Jacob|Jacob]] 18:35, 26 Sep 2006 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 23:35, 26 September 2006
Simplified Use
Instead of making a seperate template, the current construction template could be editted to accomidate what you are doing with this. --Jacob 17:52, 2 Sep 2006 (CDT)
- I didn't want to experiment on the existing template in case I got it wrong. --Macbeth 17:59, 2 Sep 2006 (CDT)
Proposal: Replace Template
Proposal to replace current construction template with this version, as this allows greater scope to inform both what is needed for the page and how this is meant to be accomplished, if applicable. --Macbeth 17:59, 2 Sep 2006 (CDT)
- Go right ahead, but if you do plan on doing so please be sure to add the text to each document with it's reason, as it would just be a plank spot on the text area if you didn't. --Jacob 19:26, 2 Sep 2006 (CDT)
Will do :). --Macbeth 06:02, 3 Sep 2006 (CDT)
"Construction" Template to be absolute?
I was thinking it would be proper for this template to replace the "To Do List" and maybe even the "stubs" seen on many articles, as it gives editors a clear why for them to say what they think an article needs to be more complete. What do you think? Should this action be undertaken, one by one all articles with connections said items will be editted accordingly (editted as in added to, and not just switching all things around, which doesn't help that much). Again, wondering what others think. --Jacob 18:35, 26 Sep 2006 (CDT)