Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Neopian Locations"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Hmm... Do we need this category?) |
(Required? No, not really...) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
So what I'm asking is, do we need this category? Is there anything that could only go in this category and not in category:neopia or a world category? --[[User:Macbeth|Macbeth]] 15:47, 4 April 2012 (CDT) | So what I'm asking is, do we need this category? Is there anything that could only go in this category and not in category:neopia or a world category? --[[User:Macbeth|Macbeth]] 15:47, 4 April 2012 (CDT) | ||
:Agreed; all articles in Category:Neopian Locations can easily be sorted into one of the smaller world sub-categories (or Category:Neopia as is the case with [[Colouring Pages]]) which serve the exact same purpose. I have no objections to this category being deleted. --[[User:Dizzy|Dizzy]] 15:52, 16 April 2012 (CDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 20:52, 16 April 2012
Required?[edit]
So I was thinking about this category - it makes more sense to me that locations in certain lands be inside their land category (e.g. giant omelette in category:tyrannia) than here. So I was going to add all the location categories to this category (category:tyrannia in category:neopian locations). But, thinking about it - isn't that just the same as category:neopia?
So what I'm asking is, do we need this category? Is there anything that could only go in this category and not in category:neopia or a world category? --Macbeth 15:47, 4 April 2012 (CDT)
- Agreed; all articles in Category:Neopian Locations can easily be sorted into one of the smaller world sub-categories (or Category:Neopia as is the case with Colouring Pages) which serve the exact same purpose. I have no objections to this category being deleted. --Dizzy 15:52, 16 April 2012 (CDT)