Difference between revisions of "Talk:Pink Poogle Toy Staff"
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
::Ohh that's a great idea guys! I'm not too familiar with wiki coding so you guys feel free to go nuts on it :) I'll drop in and add any relevant information yah? ^_^--[[User:Yukio|Yukio]] 01:57, 7 Dec 2006 (CST) | ::Ohh that's a great idea guys! I'm not too familiar with wiki coding so you guys feel free to go nuts on it :) I'll drop in and add any relevant information yah? ^_^--[[User:Yukio|Yukio]] 01:57, 7 Dec 2006 (CST) | ||
:I'm thinking organised by authority (that is, rank or permissions), greatest to lowest, and inside these by time, oldest to youngest appointments (not duration, but when the staffness started), and inside identical dates by alphabetical order?--[[User:Macbeth|Macbeth]] 12:47, 7 Dec 2006 (CST) | :I'm thinking organised by authority (that is, rank or permissions), greatest to lowest, and inside these by time, oldest to youngest appointments (not duration, but when the staffness started), and inside identical dates by alphabetical order?--[[User:Macbeth|Macbeth]] 12:47, 7 Dec 2006 (CST) | ||
::Looks like the list has been pseudo organized so far. ^_^ Can we do something with the retired list? It's getting a tad long and it is difficult to see who is currently working on the site. Maybe we can make the font smaller, or put the retired list in an optional drop down reveal list or something? Maybe it even warrants its own page? | ::Looks like the list has been pseudo organized so far. ^_^ Can we do something with the retired list? It's getting a tad long and it is difficult to see who is currently working on the site. Maybe we can make the font smaller, or put the retired list in an optional drop down reveal list or something? Maybe it even warrants its own page? --[[User:Yukio|Kym]] 01:14, 25 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 01:14, 25 August 2008
On being protected
recently protected this article so only admin could edit it, as i worried random users across the internet would edit it to make themselves look like PinkPT staff (has recently happened on the community portal as an example, with someone else claiming to be Yukio). however, this was reverted so staff members who aren't admin of the Neodex could edit and add to the article. while i can undersand that, i still worry a user will take advantage of the opportunity and edit it in such a malicious way. shall it be protected in time, or will we reverse vandalism when they come along? --Jacob 22:22, 10 Oct 2006 (CDT)
- Actually the person that edited that page was me lol. The staff page will be protected once staff aps are closed but I need a completely up-to-date page for now and I've asked the PPT staff to help me update the page. Yukio --58.165.59.30 00:06, 11 Oct 2006 (CDT)
On Layout
I was considering the layout of this page... Would it look better if the names and positions were tabulated? A column next to them for a quote or short description of some form would also be a nice addition... --Macbeth 10:47, 11 Oct 2006 (CDT)
- alright, it's time to move forward with this idea now. been sitting long enough. :D Let's see...to sort all the positions into sections, yes? and give a description of each positions duties too, yes? Fun times. also, will the members be ordered by years too? i.e. the oldest ones in their position areat the top of the list, while the newer ones at the bottom? --Jacob 22:39, 6 Dec 2006 (CST)
- Ohh that's a great idea guys! I'm not too familiar with wiki coding so you guys feel free to go nuts on it :) I'll drop in and add any relevant information yah? ^_^--Yukio 01:57, 7 Dec 2006 (CST)
- I'm thinking organised by authority (that is, rank or permissions), greatest to lowest, and inside these by time, oldest to youngest appointments (not duration, but when the staffness started), and inside identical dates by alphabetical order?--Macbeth 12:47, 7 Dec 2006 (CST)
- Looks like the list has been pseudo organized so far. ^_^ Can we do something with the retired list? It's getting a tad long and it is difficult to see who is currently working on the site. Maybe we can make the font smaller, or put the retired list in an optional drop down reveal list or something? Maybe it even warrants its own page? --Kym 01:14, 25 August 2008 (UTC)