Difference between revisions of "Talk:Faerie"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(reply to old topic, and new topic "External links clean up?") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Regular faeries== | ==Regular faeries== | ||
This page needs a section on regular faeries (i.e. their quests) | This page needs a section on regular faeries (i.e. their quests) --[[User:Duke of Earl|Duke of Earl]] 22:13, 4 Mar 2006 (CST) | ||
[[User:Duke of Earl|Duke of Earl]] 22:13, 4 Mar 2006 (CST) | |||
:There is currently a section for the regular spell faeries (which I think needs to be expanded upon), and a summary about the Faerie Quests as well. But a deep explanation about the Faerie Quests will only be given in the main article for the quest. --[[User:Jacob|Jacob]] 15:41, 28 Aug 2007 (UTC) | |||
==Battle Faerie?== | ==Battle Faerie?== | ||
| Line 11: | Line 12: | ||
:I believe it is intended to be the Battle Faerie. Although that may well be her earliest incarnation! --[[User:Macbeth|Macbeth]] 09:21, 16 Jun 2007 (CDT) | :I believe it is intended to be the Battle Faerie. Although that may well be her earliest incarnation! --[[User:Macbeth|Macbeth]] 09:21, 16 Jun 2007 (CDT) | ||
==External links clean up?== | |||
I noticed the external links section is overly large, and i thought it would be best to clean them up. How would this be done? By taking more faerie specific links (fire faerie, water faerie, etc.) and placing them on their own article. Should this be done? --[[User:Jacob|Jacob]] 15:41, 28 Aug 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:41, 28 August 2007
Regular faeries
This page needs a section on regular faeries (i.e. their quests) --Duke of Earl 22:13, 4 Mar 2006 (CST)
- There is currently a section for the regular spell faeries (which I think needs to be expanded upon), and a summary about the Faerie Quests as well. But a deep explanation about the Faerie Quests will only be given in the main article for the quest. --Jacob 15:41, 28 Aug 2007 (UTC)
Battle Faerie?
Is this the BF or someone else? Her colours are different from the BF (even from the earliest pics I've seen of her) and not one of the winners gives her a specific name/title. But the BF IS the one she closest resembles.DreamingLady 02:46, 16 Jun 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, i believe that is the Battle Faerie. *smiles at the humour* :D They drew her that way to fit the style they were trying to emulate...or maybe it's from the movie Grease? I also recall neopets making faeries dressed in pants and other clothes (calling them dolls), though i don't think they are up on the site anymore. --Jacob 02:50, 16 Jun 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, 'doll faeries' were popular as shopkeepers, for a time. --Macbeth 09:21, 16 Jun 2007 (CDT)
- I believe it is intended to be the Battle Faerie. Although that may well be her earliest incarnation! --Macbeth 09:21, 16 Jun 2007 (CDT)
External links clean up?
I noticed the external links section is overly large, and i thought it would be best to clean them up. How would this be done? By taking more faerie specific links (fire faerie, water faerie, etc.) and placing them on their own article. Should this be done? --Jacob 15:41, 28 Aug 2007 (UTC)