Difference between revisions of "Talk:Neopet"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
::Hmm. The singular only ever applied for the neopet species. The website and film are always in plural. --[[User:Macbeth|Macbeth]] 15:09, 21 Aug 2007 (UTC) | ::Hmm. The singular only ever applied for the neopet species. The website and film are always in plural. --[[User:Macbeth|Macbeth]] 15:09, 21 Aug 2007 (UTC) | ||
:::I originally made no official "neopet" or "neopets" article to be user friendly: is the person searching the NeoDex searching for the Neopets website, game, movie, or just the plurl of Neopet? If you think "Neopets" is a better disambiguation title than "Neopet", then let it be so. Just as long as all the links here are placed there (and any I've missed). Don't want any readers confused. :S --[[User:Jacob|Jacob]] 15:23, 21 Aug 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:23, 21 August 2007
Neopet(s) Disambiguation
As only one of the three entities on this disambiguation is actually Neopet - the others are both Neopets - I propose moving the disambiguation to Neopets or Neopet (disambiguation) and have the article Neopet (species) here. --Macbeth 14:59, 21 Aug 2007 (UTC)
- I thought having the singular would be better than the plurl, seeing as the plurl refers to the singular (Neopets = Neopet). Is it more confusing than simplified? --Jacob 15:06, 21 Aug 2007 (UTC)
- Hmm. The singular only ever applied for the neopet species. The website and film are always in plural. --Macbeth 15:09, 21 Aug 2007 (UTC)
- I originally made no official "neopet" or "neopets" article to be user friendly: is the person searching the NeoDex searching for the Neopets website, game, movie, or just the plurl of Neopet? If you think "Neopets" is a better disambiguation title than "Neopet", then let it be so. Just as long as all the links here are placed there (and any I've missed). Don't want any readers confused. :S --Jacob 15:23, 21 Aug 2007 (UTC)