Difference between revisions of "Talk:Scorchstone"
m |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
The user Daeron places a deletion template on the article without even stating a reason why? :S Okay. I'm confused. This ''may'' be due to his/her intention to create an article for each Scorchstone, which if that was the case, this wouldn't be deleted, but turned into a disambiguation article. However, we don't even know if we will do such a thing yet, or if it's even needed...so i suppose we are on the hold for now. --[[User:Jacob|Jacob]] 23:56, 3 Jul 2007 (UTC) | The user Daeron places a deletion template on the article without even stating a reason why? :S Okay. I'm confused. This ''may'' be due to his/her intention to create an article for each Scorchstone, which if that was the case, this wouldn't be deleted, but turned into a disambiguation article. However, we don't even know if we will do such a thing yet, or if it's even needed...so i suppose we are on the hold for now. --[[User:Jacob|Jacob]] 23:56, 3 Jul 2007 (UTC) | ||
:The Neodex is '''not''' a database of items. Articles can be made denoting types of items and item collections, but not individual items. Hence, this article should be preserved but we should not have individual articles for each scorchstone, no more than for each snowball, or codestone, or an article dedicated to the item ''2/3 Green Pepper Omelette''. --[[User:Macbeth|Macbeth]] 02:05, 4 Jul 2007 (UTC) | :The Neodex is '''not''' a database of items. Articles can be made denoting types of items and item collections, but not individual items. Hence, this article should be preserved but we should not have individual articles for each scorchstone, no more than for each snowball, or codestone, or an article dedicated to the item ''2/3 Green Pepper Omelette''. --[[User:Macbeth|Macbeth]] 02:05, 4 Jul 2007 (UTC) | ||
==List== | |||
I'm not sure if this alpha order for the list is the best way to order it. I was thinking it might be more useful to have them in two lists one of Healing Stones in order of healing ability, and the other a list of Defensive Stones in order of icons of defense. I'm guessing if they are listed they should also be notated with full Battle info instead of the short-cut I took? But the info is there now, so that should help.--[[User:Cath|Cath]] 00:00, 11 Aug 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:00, 11 August 2007
Deletion?
The user Daeron places a deletion template on the article without even stating a reason why? :S Okay. I'm confused. This may be due to his/her intention to create an article for each Scorchstone, which if that was the case, this wouldn't be deleted, but turned into a disambiguation article. However, we don't even know if we will do such a thing yet, or if it's even needed...so i suppose we are on the hold for now. --Jacob 23:56, 3 Jul 2007 (UTC)
- The Neodex is not a database of items. Articles can be made denoting types of items and item collections, but not individual items. Hence, this article should be preserved but we should not have individual articles for each scorchstone, no more than for each snowball, or codestone, or an article dedicated to the item 2/3 Green Pepper Omelette. --Macbeth 02:05, 4 Jul 2007 (UTC)
List
I'm not sure if this alpha order for the list is the best way to order it. I was thinking it might be more useful to have them in two lists one of Healing Stones in order of healing ability, and the other a list of Defensive Stones in order of icons of defense. I'm guessing if they are listed they should also be notated with full Battle info instead of the short-cut I took? But the info is there now, so that should help.--Cath 00:00, 11 Aug 2007 (UTC)