Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Broken"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(OK then.) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
I mean, there have been times when I just wanted to tag something with a "Nuke here, please." label, but Template:Construction is much more... Erm... Constructive. --[[User:Macbeth|Macbeth]] 14:14, 5 Jan 2007 (CST) | I mean, there have been times when I just wanted to tag something with a "Nuke here, please." label, but Template:Construction is much more... Erm... Constructive. --[[User:Macbeth|Macbeth]] 14:14, 5 Jan 2007 (CST) | ||
:I'm thinking that is right. we don't really need this template or the other when we have a perfectly working one that is actually used. Delete this template and the other then? --[[User:Jacob|Jacob]] 15:09, 5 Jan 2007 (CST) | :I'm thinking that is right. we don't really need this template or the other when we have a perfectly working one that is actually used. Delete this template and the other then? --[[User:Jacob|Jacob]] 15:09, 5 Jan 2007 (CST) | ||
OK then. I kept them off NeoDex:Template in anticipation of this. --[[User:Macbeth|Macbeth]] 15:19, 5 Jan 2007 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 21:19, 5 January 2007
Possible deletion?
Is this really necessary with Template:FixMe? Are either necessary with Template:Construction?
I mean, there have been times when I just wanted to tag something with a "Nuke here, please." label, but Template:Construction is much more... Erm... Constructive. --Macbeth 14:14, 5 Jan 2007 (CST)
- I'm thinking that is right. we don't really need this template or the other when we have a perfectly working one that is actually used. Delete this template and the other then? --Jacob 15:09, 5 Jan 2007 (CST)
OK then. I kept them off NeoDex:Template in anticipation of this. --Macbeth 15:19, 5 Jan 2007 (CST)