Difference between revisions of "User talk:Himmelsdemon"

From NeoDex
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Omg, thanks :))
Line 3: Line 3:
:Congratulations! You deserve it, you are forever keeping us on our toes and mercilessly attacking typos and inconsistencies ;). --[[User:Macbeth|Macbeth]] 08:45, 10 Jan 2007 (CST)
:Congratulations! You deserve it, you are forever keeping us on our toes and mercilessly attacking typos and inconsistencies ;). --[[User:Macbeth|Macbeth]] 08:45, 10 Jan 2007 (CST)
::Wow, thanks!!! Now I finally can block users which spam the [[NeoBoard]] article xD. --[[User:Himmelsdemon|Demon]] 10:37, 10 Jan 2007 (CST)
::Wow, thanks!!! Now I finally can block users which spam the [[NeoBoard]] article xD. --[[User:Himmelsdemon|Demon]] 10:37, 10 Jan 2007 (CST)
==The spam article==
I noticed you protected the latest spam article "Neodex/neodex/index.php". I've always deleted such articles like this so users wouldn't get confused about what it was. your protection of it took me by surprise, and i'm wondering if that should be done instead of deletion. also, do you know what is up with articles of this type being created? i tried looking into it, but couldn't find anything similar in other wikis (yet at least). --[[User:Jacob|Jacob]] 19:12, 17 Jan 2007 (CST)

Revision as of 01:12, 18 January 2007

Sysop Powers Gained

For your hard work and dedication to the NeoDex, i feel you earned the right to be an administrator. continue to keep up the good work. *shakes hand* :) --Jacob 07:37, 10 Jan 2007 (CST)

Congratulations! You deserve it, you are forever keeping us on our toes and mercilessly attacking typos and inconsistencies ;). --Macbeth 08:45, 10 Jan 2007 (CST)
Wow, thanks!!! Now I finally can block users which spam the NeoBoard article xD. --Demon 10:37, 10 Jan 2007 (CST)

The spam article

I noticed you protected the latest spam article "Neodex/neodex/index.php". I've always deleted such articles like this so users wouldn't get confused about what it was. your protection of it took me by surprise, and i'm wondering if that should be done instead of deletion. also, do you know what is up with articles of this type being created? i tried looking into it, but couldn't find anything similar in other wikis (yet at least). --Jacob 19:12, 17 Jan 2007 (CST)