Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Free-Food"

From NeoDex
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(title and reply)
(Removal of template)
Line 3: Line 3:


:you are correct there. Needs to be updated, and possibly discussed if it should be removed as well. Been awhile since I've seen this and the article it's on, so it's an almost guarantee. --[[User:Jacob|Jacob]] 03:07, 18 Nov 2007 (UTC)
:you are correct there. Needs to be updated, and possibly discussed if it should be removed as well. Been awhile since I've seen this and the article it's on, so it's an almost guarantee. --[[User:Jacob|Jacob]] 03:07, 18 Nov 2007 (UTC)
==To be remove?==
Should we remove this template due to lack of use? There are two articles (okay, it's only one now, since it was just removed from [[Daily]] article) which uses this template. Other than easily update the two articles at the same time, I can't think of any other good reason to keep this. --[[User:SwordFire|SwordFire]] <sup>( [[User talk:SwordFire|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/SwordFire|contrib]] )</sup> 01:31, 1 Jun 2008 (CDT)

Revision as of 06:31, 1 June 2008

Update

OK, this needs to be edited, even if very minorly. The Islandberry Crunch has been removed from the site, as can be confirmed by simply clicking the link. -- This comment was left unsigned by Gaeamil (talk | contribs)

you are correct there. Needs to be updated, and possibly discussed if it should be removed as well. Been awhile since I've seen this and the article it's on, so it's an almost guarantee. --Jacob 03:07, 18 Nov 2007 (UTC)

To be remove?

Should we remove this template due to lack of use? There are two articles (okay, it's only one now, since it was just removed from Daily article) which uses this template. Other than easily update the two articles at the same time, I can't think of any other good reason to keep this. --SwordFire ( talk | contrib ) 01:31, 1 Jun 2008 (CDT)