Difference between revisions of "Talk:Tax Beast"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Disappeared?) |
DreamingLady (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Disappeared?== | ==Disappeared?== | ||
An edit by Demon states "As of January 2007, the Tax Beast hasn't been seen for a long period of time". Where is this stated? I find it very odd a challenger of the battledome wouldn't be given to the rest of the users of Neopets for "a long period of time". :o --[[User:Jacob|Jacob]] 21:10, 16 Jul 2007 (UTC) | An edit by Demon states "As of January 2007, the Tax Beast hasn't been seen for a long period of time". Where is this stated? I find it very odd a challenger of the battledome wouldn't be given to the rest of the users of Neopets for "a long period of time". :o --[[User:Jacob|Jacob]] 21:10, 16 Jul 2007 (UTC) | ||
:"I was wondering... what is the highest amount of Neopoints that a Random Event can steal? Because a few minutes ago, I lost 5,000 Neopoints to a Random Event. ~mydogginger500 | |||
Doh! Kadoatie'd, huh? ;D Actually, there are two Random Events worse than that, which take a percentage of the NP you have out, but they have been out of comission for quite a long time. We should really fix that. *rubs hands together evilly*" - Editorial 296. I think this is an obvious reference. [[User:DreamingLady|DreamingLady]] 11:32, 17 Jul 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 11:32, 17 July 2007
Disappeared?
An edit by Demon states "As of January 2007, the Tax Beast hasn't been seen for a long period of time". Where is this stated? I find it very odd a challenger of the battledome wouldn't be given to the rest of the users of Neopets for "a long period of time". :o --Jacob 21:10, 16 Jul 2007 (UTC)
- "I was wondering... what is the highest amount of Neopoints that a Random Event can steal? Because a few minutes ago, I lost 5,000 Neopoints to a Random Event. ~mydogginger500
Doh! Kadoatie'd, huh? ;D Actually, there are two Random Events worse than that, which take a percentage of the NP you have out, but they have been out of comission for quite a long time. We should really fix that. *rubs hands together evilly*" - Editorial 296. I think this is an obvious reference. DreamingLady 11:32, 17 Jul 2007 (UTC)