Difference between revisions of "Talk:Scorchstone"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(deletion? why?) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Deletion?== | ==Deletion?== | ||
The user Daeron places a deletion template on the article without even stating a reason why? :S Okay. I'm confused. This ''may'' be due to his/her intention to create an article for each Scorchstone, which if that was the case, this wouldn't be deleted, but turned into a disambiguation article. However, we don't even know if we will do such a thing yet, or if it's even needed...so i suppose we are on the hold for now. --[[User:Jacob|Jacob]] 23:56, 3 Jul 2007 (UTC) | The user Daeron places a deletion template on the article without even stating a reason why? :S Okay. I'm confused. This ''may'' be due to his/her intention to create an article for each Scorchstone, which if that was the case, this wouldn't be deleted, but turned into a disambiguation article. However, we don't even know if we will do such a thing yet, or if it's even needed...so i suppose we are on the hold for now. --[[User:Jacob|Jacob]] 23:56, 3 Jul 2007 (UTC) | ||
:The Neodex is '''not''' a database of items. Articles can be made denoting types of items and item collections, but not individual items. Hence, this article should be preserved but we should not have individual articles for each scorchstone, no more than for each snowball, or codestone, or an article dedicated to the item ''2/3 Green Pepper Omelette. --[[User:Macbeth|Macbeth]] 02:05, 4 Jul 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:05, 4 July 2007
Deletion?
The user Daeron places a deletion template on the article without even stating a reason why? :S Okay. I'm confused. This may be due to his/her intention to create an article for each Scorchstone, which if that was the case, this wouldn't be deleted, but turned into a disambiguation article. However, we don't even know if we will do such a thing yet, or if it's even needed...so i suppose we are on the hold for now. --Jacob 23:56, 3 Jul 2007 (UTC)
- The Neodex is not a database of items. Articles can be made denoting types of items and item collections, but not individual items. Hence, this article should be preserved but we should not have individual articles for each scorchstone, no more than for each snowball, or codestone, or an article dedicated to the item 2/3 Green Pepper Omelette. --Macbeth 02:05, 4 Jul 2007 (UTC)