Difference between revisions of "Talk:Mr. Krawley"
A NeezIes A (talk | contribs) m (Talk:Mr. Krawley moved to Talk:Mr. Crawley) |
m (Talk:Clifford Crawley moved to Talk:Mr. Krawley: reverted vandalism) |
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 20:14, 25 April 2010
Elephante[edit]
Mr Krawley was the elephante? --Macbeth 10:40, 7 Jan 2007 (CST)
- Yes, he was...or i would believe it is so given the information (Neopets isn't outright saying it as with a lot of things). Take a look at the eyes of Mr. Krawley and the Pink Elephante. Also, click on the Red Wocky gypsy of the image where the Elephante used to be, and you will find there never was an Elephante part of their group, i.e. someone (Mr. Krawley?) was posing as one.
- Complicated? It adds a new depth to the story, and makes you wonder why Krawley did what he did (as he was the cause and the cure of the events). Will only learn in the future why it all worked out as it did... --Jacob 11:09, 7 Jan 2007 (CST)
- Jacob, just a question: May I use the ideas (not the exact text) given in the article for our German wiki with giving you and the Neodex credit for these? The idea Mr. Krawley might have been the elephante sounds interesting.--Demon 11:22, 7 Jan 2007 (CST)
Feel free to share the information. I can't make any claim to the "discovery" of the connection between Krawley and the Elephante, as it's simply an observation from what TNT presented us...though i would be surprised if i was the first one who saw it (don't think i am). Again, feel free to spread the information, as it is something to think about. --Jacob 11:53, 7 Jan 2007 (CST)
- I agree, it would add an interesting level of depth. Could we move this to an 'aliases' section, or something, though, to expand on it in the article? There is a very good case for him being the Elephante.
- And for the record, I believe Mr Krawley did it to teach the Neovians to be happy with what they have. --Macbeth 11:54, 7 Jan 2007 (CST)
- Hey, this could explain why Bruno didn't revert; he has accepted the bad sides of what he had become while the others were not at peace with themselves... --213.39.195.44 06:12, 8 Jan 2007 (CST)
I think it's deeper than saying Mr. Krawley wanted them to be happy with what they have. he manipulated and ruined the happiness of Sophie, making her bitter and reclusive. His methods also made the inhabitants of Neovia monsters, something they must hold with shame for a long time, and he set events which released all the inmates of Meepit Oaks as well, killing off all the staff in the process. And back to Sophie, he seems to enjoy the idea of her living alone from her family (as it seems he was smiling in that scene). There is so much unexplained, because while he caused so much pain, it was also him which lead Gilly to the cure for the village. It's like he was in control of the situation the whole time...his drama. *sigh* i doubt we will know why he did what he did any time soon. The mystery TNT left us will surely be good fuel for a plot of the future. --Jacob 19:41, 8 Jan 2007 (CST)
Article image[edit]
The current image which has been uploaded for this article is the Neopets TCG card of Krawley. While that's fine and all, if a better image should come around (one that doesn't show it to be a TCG card), I think it would be best to use that other image. No, this does not mean take the image down. Just saying it's fine till another one comes along. *winks at editor who uploaded it* --Jacob 21:46, 17 Dec 2007 (UTC)
- I uploaded it, and I could put it onto paint and cut out the picture of krawley, only revealing his picture and not the TCG if you want. Xweetok 06:01, 17 dec 2007 (UTC)
- If you could do that, it would be awesome. :) --Jacob 01:52, 18 Dec 2007 (UTC)
- Ok, I found a new image. It's from the ToW theme, twards the bottem. He's standing in a white background holding a bottle of hissi oil. The only problem I fond with it is it only shows his head and waist; the rest of his body is cut off. Which one do you guys think is better? (I can still take out the back of the TCG Card) Xweetok 08:56, 19 Dec 2007