Difference between revisions of "Talk:Former Pink Poogle Toy Staff"

From NeoDex
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (reverted vandalism)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:


: *Chuckles* Theoretically, Macbeth is a "former" sysop who becomes an administrator. Guess there is no easier way to show this information on the [[Pink Poogle Toy Staff]] article. --[[User:SwordFire|SwordFire]] <sup>( [[User talk:SwordFire|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/SwordFire|contrib]] )</sup> 12:44, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
: *Chuckles* Theoretically, Macbeth is a "former" sysop who becomes an administrator. Guess there is no easier way to show this information on the [[Pink Poogle Toy Staff]] article. --[[User:SwordFire|SwordFire]] <sup>( [[User talk:SwordFire|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/SwordFire|contrib]] )</sup> 12:44, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
::Even more theoretically, Macbeth is '''still''' a  ([http://pinkpt.com/neodex/index.php?title=Special%3AListusers&username=&group=sysop&limit=500 sysop]. Maybe we could add a note like "(promoted to bureaucrat)"? --[[User:Himmelsdemon|Demon]] 23:07, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
:::<nowiki>*</nowiki>laughs* I seem to be causing some controversy. How's that? --[[User:Macbeth|Macbeth]] 11:24, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 00:08, 28 December 2012

System Operator - Macbeth (18 Aug 2006 - 1 Apr 2009)[edit]

Isn't Macbeth still a current PPT staff member? Just one that got promoted? - Leo 10:38, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

*Chuckles* Theoretically, Macbeth is a "former" sysop who becomes an administrator. Guess there is no easier way to show this information on the Pink Poogle Toy Staff article. --SwordFire ( talk | contrib ) 12:44, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
Even more theoretically, Macbeth is still a (sysop. Maybe we could add a note like "(promoted to bureaucrat)"? --Demon 23:07, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
*laughs* I seem to be causing some controversy. How's that? --Macbeth 11:24, 10 May 2009 (UTC)