Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Free-Food"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→To be remove?: ...probably) |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
OK, this needs to be edited, even if very minorly. The Islandberry Crunch has been removed from the site, as can be confirmed by simply clicking the link. | ==Update== | ||
OK, this needs to be edited, even if very minorly. The Islandberry Crunch has been removed from the site, as can be confirmed by simply clicking the link. {{sign|Gaeamil}} | |||
:you are correct there. Needs to be updated, and possibly discussed if it should be removed as well. Been awhile since I've seen this and the article it's on, so it's an almost guarantee. --[[User:Jacob|Jacob]] 03:07, 18 Nov 2007 (UTC) | |||
==To be remove?== | |||
Should we remove this template due to lack of use? There are two articles (okay, it's only one now, since it was just removed from [[Daily]] article) which uses this template. Other than easily update the two articles at the same time, I can't think of any other good reason to keep this. --[[User:SwordFire|SwordFire]] <sup>( [[User talk:SwordFire|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/SwordFire|contrib]] )</sup> 01:31, 1 Jun 2008 (CDT) | |||
:Considering how old this template is, as are the articles which use/used it, it probably does need to be taken out. I always ''did'' feel uncomfortable about it anyway. :S --[[User:Jacob|Jacob]] 12:16, 18 Jun 2008 (CDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 17:16, 18 June 2008
Update[edit]
OK, this needs to be edited, even if very minorly. The Islandberry Crunch has been removed from the site, as can be confirmed by simply clicking the link. -- This comment was left unsigned by Gaeamil (talk | contribs)
- you are correct there. Needs to be updated, and possibly discussed if it should be removed as well. Been awhile since I've seen this and the article it's on, so it's an almost guarantee. --Jacob 03:07, 18 Nov 2007 (UTC)
To be remove?[edit]
Should we remove this template due to lack of use? There are two articles (okay, it's only one now, since it was just removed from Daily article) which uses this template. Other than easily update the two articles at the same time, I can't think of any other good reason to keep this. --SwordFire ( talk | contrib ) 01:31, 1 Jun 2008 (CDT)
- Considering how old this template is, as are the articles which use/used it, it probably does need to be taken out. I always did feel uncomfortable about it anyway. :S --Jacob 12:16, 18 Jun 2008 (CDT)