Difference between revisions of "Talk:Eye Of Storms"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Propose deletion== | ==Propose deletion== | ||
Item is not notable, it is a collection of items, it is not a Hidden Tower item... --[[User:Macbeth|Macbeth]] 01:47, 18 Jul 2007 (UTC) | |||
:I think it's notable due to the fact it's been used more than once by a challenger over the years, as opposed to a character specific battledome equipment. it's similar to the ''Prismatic Mirror'', which is used by many challengers as well, and is quite powerful. Plus, i find it a little strange these characters are carrying an eye around...of "the storms" or something. seemed bizarre enough to note. --[[User:Jacob|Jacob]] 04:17, 18 Jul 2007 (UTC) | |||
::Hmmm, very well. Although, perhaps we can compile such items into one article... 'One-player Battledome Items used by multiple opponents', or something...? --[[User:Macbeth|Macbeth]] 21:19, 18 Jul 2007 (UTC) | |||
:::If a few more articles for battledome Equipment of this type be created, we could do that. --[[User:Jacob|Jacob]] 04:02, 19 Jul 2007 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 04:02, 19 July 2007
Propose deletion[edit]
Item is not notable, it is a collection of items, it is not a Hidden Tower item... --Macbeth 01:47, 18 Jul 2007 (UTC)
- I think it's notable due to the fact it's been used more than once by a challenger over the years, as opposed to a character specific battledome equipment. it's similar to the Prismatic Mirror, which is used by many challengers as well, and is quite powerful. Plus, i find it a little strange these characters are carrying an eye around...of "the storms" or something. seemed bizarre enough to note. --Jacob 04:17, 18 Jul 2007 (UTC)
- Hmmm, very well. Although, perhaps we can compile such items into one article... 'One-player Battledome Items used by multiple opponents', or something...? --Macbeth 21:19, 18 Jul 2007 (UTC)
- If a few more articles for battledome Equipment of this type be created, we could do that. --Jacob 04:02, 19 Jul 2007 (UTC)