Difference between revisions of "Talk:Hughman"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(redirect instead?) |
m |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Delete vs. Redirect== | |||
I fail to see how one of many unreleased Aprils Fool Neopets should be notable. I mean, we don't even have an article about the Fuzio, and that was actually an existing Neopet.--[[User:Himmelsdemon|Demon]] 22:13, 13 Jul 2007 (UTC) | I fail to see how one of many unreleased Aprils Fool Neopets should be notable. I mean, we don't even have an article about the Fuzio, and that was actually an existing Neopet.--[[User:Himmelsdemon|Demon]] 22:13, 13 Jul 2007 (UTC) | ||
:Correction. We '''do''' have an article about the Fuzio. It's called the [[Kyrii]]. ;) But you are right all the same. This is really unnotable as a stand alone article. Seeing as this is about the [[April Fools' Day]] joke, perhaps it should be a redirect instead? --[[User:Jacob|Jacob]] 00:29, 14 Jul 2007 (UTC) | :Correction. We '''do''' have an article about the Fuzio. It's called the [[Kyrii]]. ;) But you are right all the same. This is really unnotable as a stand alone article. Seeing as this is about the [[April Fools' Day]] joke, perhaps it should be a redirect instead? --[[User:Jacob|Jacob]] 00:29, 14 Jul 2007 (UTC) | ||
::Oh, forgot to look if it was mentioned in the article *blushes* And I am sorry, but if we keep this article and want to be consequent, we have to make articles about all the other April Fools Neopets and let them redirect to the [[April Fools' Day]]. The likeliness for anybody to search especially for the Hughman is incredibly low. Of course I don't ask you to make a decision within the next few minutes without the opinions of other editors, I am just bringing forward my arguments.--[[User:Himmelsdemon|Demon]] 00:38, 14 Jul 2007 (UTC) | |||
:::True, all the joke pet names would need to be created as redirects as well. And maybe that ''would'' be good? It can be done for the [[Gnorbu]] for sure, who was originally one of those pets. plus if those names are used in the future or if another pet is based on them, it could safe time for the future. *ponders* Yes, more input from others would be good. ;) --[[User:Jacob|Jacob]] 00:41, 14 Jul 2007 (UTC) | |||
::::Ah, yes, redirect, I agree. --[[User:Macbeth|Macbeth]] 00:46, 31 Jul 2007 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 00:46, 31 July 2007
Delete vs. Redirect[edit]
I fail to see how one of many unreleased Aprils Fool Neopets should be notable. I mean, we don't even have an article about the Fuzio, and that was actually an existing Neopet.--Demon 22:13, 13 Jul 2007 (UTC)
- Correction. We do have an article about the Fuzio. It's called the Kyrii. ;) But you are right all the same. This is really unnotable as a stand alone article. Seeing as this is about the April Fools' Day joke, perhaps it should be a redirect instead? --Jacob 00:29, 14 Jul 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, forgot to look if it was mentioned in the article *blushes* And I am sorry, but if we keep this article and want to be consequent, we have to make articles about all the other April Fools Neopets and let them redirect to the April Fools' Day. The likeliness for anybody to search especially for the Hughman is incredibly low. Of course I don't ask you to make a decision within the next few minutes without the opinions of other editors, I am just bringing forward my arguments.--Demon 00:38, 14 Jul 2007 (UTC)
- True, all the joke pet names would need to be created as redirects as well. And maybe that would be good? It can be done for the Gnorbu for sure, who was originally one of those pets. plus if those names are used in the future or if another pet is based on them, it could safe time for the future. *ponders* Yes, more input from others would be good. ;) --Jacob 00:41, 14 Jul 2007 (UTC)
- Ah, yes, redirect, I agree. --Macbeth 00:46, 31 Jul 2007 (UTC)