Difference between revisions of "Template talk:CharacterInfo"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "I propose that we revamp character articles, by utilizing a template much like the one presented on this page. Along with this, "Info Boxes" can be created for Lands, Faeries (Co...") |
m (Session expired) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I propose that we revamp character articles, by utilizing a template much like the one presented on this page. Along with this, "Info Boxes" can be created for Lands, Faeries (Column added for "Alignment"), and what ever else seems suiting. I know I may have not presented this best way, I'm too used to the differences already established on my wiki by my predecessors, being unaware of how several basic things operated. Yay or nay? --[[User:Puma|Puma]] 02:55, 21 January 2014 (UTC) | I propose that we revamp character articles, by utilizing a template much like the one presented on this page. Along with this, "Info Boxes" can be created for Lands, Faeries (Column added for "Alignment"), and what ever else seems suiting. I know I may have not presented this best way, I'm too used to the differences already established on my wiki by my predecessors, being unaware of how several basic things operated. Yay or nay? --[[User:Puma|Puma]] 02:55, 21 January 2014 (UTC) | ||
:I'll admit, I was unaware of the template(s) known under the name as "Infobox" this whole time. The existence of these make the work with this template and it's CSS useless, as this could have been created using an alteration of those rather than installing new CSS and creating a template out of that. I'll rewrite for the sake of uniformity. --[[User:Puma|Puma]] 04:08, 21 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 04:09, 21 January 2014
I propose that we revamp character articles, by utilizing a template much like the one presented on this page. Along with this, "Info Boxes" can be created for Lands, Faeries (Column added for "Alignment"), and what ever else seems suiting. I know I may have not presented this best way, I'm too used to the differences already established on my wiki by my predecessors, being unaware of how several basic things operated. Yay or nay? --Puma 02:55, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
- I'll admit, I was unaware of the template(s) known under the name as "Infobox" this whole time. The existence of these make the work with this template and it's CSS useless, as this could have been created using an alteration of those rather than installing new CSS and creating a template out of that. I'll rewrite for the sake of uniformity. --Puma 04:08, 21 January 2014 (UTC)