Difference between revisions of "Talk:King Skarl"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
AchyfiLover (talk | contribs) (I have editied a discussion page, but since Jacob said I could, I hope it is alright) |
m (Talk:A Neezles A is a Grumpy Little Girl moved to Talk:King Skarl over redirect: revert) |
||
| (22 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== both == | == both == | ||
King Skarl is in a game named "Grumpy Old King" and tell him a joke, it doesn't have to make sense for free food to sell for a profit. He is also a battledome challenger, unknown HP he has while battling, my guess would be 350 HP. | King Skarl is in a game named "Grumpy Old King" and tell him a joke, it doesn't have to make sense for free food to sell for a profit. He is also a battledome challenger, unknown HP he has while battling, my guess would be 350 HP.{{sign|AchyfiLover}} | ||
:[[Grumpy Old King]] is already linked to in the "See also" section. And since the article has a Battledome section, it is pretty obvious that he used to be a battledome opponent. Also, please use a more... expressive title next time.--[[User:Himmelsdemon|Demon]] 20:53, 28 Jul 2007 (UTC) | |||
::The "see also" section? Never heard of it. --[[User:AchyfiLover|AchyfiLover]] | |||
:::Of the article. The [[King_Skarl#See_Also|see also section of the article]]. --[[User:Macbeth|Macbeth]] 22:37, 28 Jul 2007 (UTC) | |||
:::Hmm, okay. --[[User:AchyfiLover|AchyfiLover]] | |||
Latest revision as of 14:29, 12 October 2009
both[edit]
King Skarl is in a game named "Grumpy Old King" and tell him a joke, it doesn't have to make sense for free food to sell for a profit. He is also a battledome challenger, unknown HP he has while battling, my guess would be 350 HP.-- This comment was left unsigned by AchyfiLover (talk | contribs)
- Grumpy Old King is already linked to in the "See also" section. And since the article has a Battledome section, it is pretty obvious that he used to be a battledome opponent. Also, please use a more... expressive title next time.--Demon 20:53, 28 Jul 2007 (UTC)
- The "see also" section? Never heard of it. --AchyfiLover
- Of the article. The see also section of the article. --Macbeth 22:37, 28 Jul 2007 (UTC)
- The "see also" section? Never heard of it. --AchyfiLover
- Hmm, okay. --AchyfiLover