Difference between revisions of "User talk:A Neezles A"
A Neezles A (talk | contribs) m (→User:Hagrid835) |
(→User:Hagrid835: block + explanation) |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
:I agree, Jacob. --[[User:A Neezles A|Destiny]] 00:53, 29 September 2009 (UTC) | :I agree, Jacob. --[[User:A Neezles A|Destiny]] 00:53, 29 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
::I see. I agree that they should be blocked because their usernames are obviously inappropriate. But I suggest keeping the edits, just like what you suggested earlier. [[User:Pinkgirl34|Pink]][[User talk:Pinkgirl34|girl]][[User:Pinkgirl34/NQII Walkthrough|34]] 01:38, 29 September 2009 (UTC) | ::I see. I agree that they should be blocked because their usernames are obviously inappropriate. But I suggest keeping the edits, just like what you suggested earlier. [[User:Pinkgirl34|Pink]][[User talk:Pinkgirl34|girl]][[User:Pinkgirl34/NQII Walkthrough|34]] 01:38, 29 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
:::I'll block the user then but leave a message as to why the block is there. --[[User:Dizzy|Dizzy]] 04:23, 29 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:23, 29 September 2009
User talk:A Neezles A/Archive1
Messages
Greetings from Jacob
Greetings! Just thought I would stop by and say hello. If you are unaware, I am Jacob, former admin of the NeoDex. It's been awhile since I've been around, and while I don't know what's really happened between now and then, I still have some articles I've been meaning to touch upon. It's good to see you've taken to the NeoDex, and have even made use of the username space provided to users. And I thought only I and a few others would do so. ;) --Jacob 06:35, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
- Hiya there Jacob. Yes I have read the NeoDex before and I do know you. I wondered about your long absence somehow.
User:Hagrid835
Hi, just wondering, should we tag his sockpuppets and request for them to be blocked even if they are not used for vandalism but are used for good faith edits? Pinkgirl34 16:37, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- Nope. Destiny Charlotte 16:52, 27 September 2009 (UTC) Good faith edits should always be welcome.
- And to be sure the accounts are sock, mind you. No socks please, but be sure something is a sock at least. ;) --Jacob 23:45, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- My suggestion is that you please leave the good faith edits there, since you said above earlier that good faith edits are always welcome. For example, this user has reverted vandalism by another IP, and by reverting him you've just placed the vandalism back on the page, as shown here. Pinkgirl34 00:07, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
They should be blocked/deleted/suspended/etc. to begin with since they are targeting a single editor who they are not. That is the point. If they are the same person...then we have an issue. The edits can stay if they are valid, but whoever that editor is cannot and will not edit from an account that pokes at another editor. Final. --Jacob 00:30, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
- I agree, Jacob. --Destiny 00:53, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
- I see. I agree that they should be blocked because their usernames are obviously inappropriate. But I suggest keeping the edits, just like what you suggested earlier. Pinkgirl34 01:38, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
- I'll block the user then but leave a message as to why the block is there. --Dizzy 04:23, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
- I see. I agree that they should be blocked because their usernames are obviously inappropriate. But I suggest keeping the edits, just like what you suggested earlier. Pinkgirl34 01:38, 29 September 2009 (UTC)