Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Colours"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Response) |
(→Include more colours?: Agree with Cath) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:I believe the line is being drawn at PB colors or possibly "non-plain" pb colors... meaning not brown or purple or pink... etc... If you must have an article for all of the colors, we could have a single article for the "Basic colors"... if one doesn't exist yet. Although the petpet lists for these colors could be interesting, as well as lengthy. :S Welcome back. --[[User:Cath|Cath]] 21:50, 16 Jun 2008 (CDT) | :I believe the line is being drawn at PB colors or possibly "non-plain" pb colors... meaning not brown or purple or pink... etc... If you must have an article for all of the colors, we could have a single article for the "Basic colors"... if one doesn't exist yet. Although the petpet lists for these colors could be interesting, as well as lengthy. :S Welcome back. --[[User:Cath|Cath]] 21:50, 16 Jun 2008 (CDT) | ||
::I agree with Cath - Another alternative name will be "Plain colours". By the way, welcome back - You have a LOT of catching up to do. ;) --[[User:SwordFire|SwordFire]] <sup>( [[User talk:SwordFire|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/SwordFire|contrib]] )</sup> 00:51, 17 Jun 2008 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 05:51, 17 June 2008
Include more colours?
In my absence, it would seem more colour articles were added, such as Starry and Skunk. I've refrained from doing such things, because it would mean to eventually make an article about "Red", which seems rather redundant. What do the rest of you think? --Jacob 20:11, 16 Jun 2008 (CDT)
- I believe the line is being drawn at PB colors or possibly "non-plain" pb colors... meaning not brown or purple or pink... etc... If you must have an article for all of the colors, we could have a single article for the "Basic colors"... if one doesn't exist yet. Although the petpet lists for these colors could be interesting, as well as lengthy. :S Welcome back. --Cath 21:50, 16 Jun 2008 (CDT)