Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Funfiller"
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
::Have you SEEN some of the cached history pages i used to link to (as that WAS what i was doing in the past)? Misspellings, bad grammer, missing wiki links...if the links direct to the clpboard i have set up right now for the content, everything will always be updated. --[[User:Jacob|Jacob]] 22:41, 26 Jul 2007 (UTC) | ::Have you SEEN some of the cached history pages i used to link to (as that WAS what i was doing in the past)? Misspellings, bad grammer, missing wiki links...if the links direct to the clpboard i have set up right now for the content, everything will always be updated. --[[User:Jacob|Jacob]] 22:41, 26 Jul 2007 (UTC) | ||
:::Well, we could fix those mistakes, revert to the current version, and have it link to the updated historical version perhaps? Well, anyway... So, part 12? End in sight, or is this an indefinite endeavour? --[[User:Macbeth|Macbeth]] 23:37, 26 Jul 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:37, 26 July 2007
The purpose of "Funfiller"
Suppose this needs a little more highlight seeing as it's part of the front page, right? ;) Originally, the "Funfiller" was created as a extra for the filler in the current design supplied by NeoEva88. I then thought it would be interesting to have a section admins could have fun with, updating funny or interesting comments to the front page. It has, of course, only been used by me...and not that much i can say. So, as a ways to let all admins know...here we are. :D
On the future of the funfiller, i'm unsure. Do we still want or need a funfiller? We can try to update it more often and see if it catches on with other visitors. Mind you, admins who upload content to the funfiller need to create clipboard pages like i have in order to link back to them. Other than that...yeah. Looking forward to see what other people have to say about this. Time to make a long awaited update to the Battle for the Dung (almost a year to finish? :S)... --Jacob 00:13, 29 May 2007 (CDT)
- Instead of clipboard pages, could the links not just link to the template's history? --Macbeth 17:08, 26 Jul 2007 (UTC)
- Have you SEEN some of the cached history pages i used to link to (as that WAS what i was doing in the past)? Misspellings, bad grammer, missing wiki links...if the links direct to the clpboard i have set up right now for the content, everything will always be updated. --Jacob 22:41, 26 Jul 2007 (UTC)
- Well, we could fix those mistakes, revert to the current version, and have it link to the updated historical version perhaps? Well, anyway... So, part 12? End in sight, or is this an indefinite endeavour? --Macbeth 23:37, 26 Jul 2007 (UTC)