User talk:76.219.254.104 - Revision history

Thomas8787543 at 02:53, 23 October 2009

2009-10-23T02:53:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:53, 23 October 2009
Line 6:		Line 6:
	::As I understand it, Captain Dread ''is'' the one who sunk Old Maraqua to the bottom of the sea. That was how history wrote out. And yet the plot with New Maraqua confuses things, almost as if they are trying to [[Wikipedia:Retroactive continuity\|retcon]] the whole event, as I believe Scarblade mentions of finishing what he started in the comics. So there is good reason for the confusion. However, to ignore the fact that it was indeed Dread who originally sunk the city cannot and will not be ignored. I propose a section if each article to speak on this confusion. --[[User:Jacob\|Jacob]] 14:11, 21 October 2009 (UTC)		::As I understand it, Captain Dread ''is'' the one who sunk Old Maraqua to the bottom of the sea. That was how history wrote out. And yet the plot with New Maraqua confuses things, almost as if they are trying to [[Wikipedia:Retroactive continuity\|retcon]] the whole event, as I believe Scarblade mentions of finishing what he started in the comics. So there is good reason for the confusion. However, to ignore the fact that it was indeed Dread who originally sunk the city cannot and will not be ignored. I propose a section if each article to speak on this confusion. --[[User:Jacob\|Jacob]] 14:11, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

	Hmm he does raise a good point there.. I think ~~tll~~ see what the TNT say about it..--[[User:Thomas8787543\|Thomas8787543]] 02:46, 23 October 2009 (UTC)		Hmm he does raise a good point there.. I think ill see what the TNT has to say about it..--[[User:Thomas8787543\|Thomas8787543]] 02:46, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

Thomas8787543 at 02:46, 23 October 2009

2009-10-23T02:46:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:46, 23 October 2009
Line 6:		Line 6:
	::As I understand it, Captain Dread ''is'' the one who sunk Old Maraqua to the bottom of the sea. That was how history wrote out. And yet the plot with New Maraqua confuses things, almost as if they are trying to [[Wikipedia:Retroactive continuity\|retcon]] the whole event, as I believe Scarblade mentions of finishing what he started in the comics. So there is good reason for the confusion. However, to ignore the fact that it was indeed Dread who originally sunk the city cannot and will not be ignored. I propose a section if each article to speak on this confusion. --[[User:Jacob\|Jacob]] 14:11, 21 October 2009 (UTC)		::As I understand it, Captain Dread ''is'' the one who sunk Old Maraqua to the bottom of the sea. That was how history wrote out. And yet the plot with New Maraqua confuses things, almost as if they are trying to [[Wikipedia:Retroactive continuity\|retcon]] the whole event, as I believe Scarblade mentions of finishing what he started in the comics. So there is good reason for the confusion. However, to ignore the fact that it was indeed Dread who originally sunk the city cannot and will not be ignored. I propose a section if each article to speak on this confusion. --[[User:Jacob\|Jacob]] 14:11, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

	Hmm he does raise a good point there.. I think tll see what the TNT say about it..--[[~~Special~~:~~Contributions/76.219.254.104~~\|~~76.219.254.104~~]] 02:46, 23 October 2009 (UTC)		Hmm he does raise a good point there.. I think tll see what the TNT say about it..--[[User:Thomas8787543\|Thomas8787543]] 02:46, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

76.219.254.104: /* Captain Scarblade */

2009-10-23T02:46:05Z

Captain Scarblade

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:46, 23 October 2009
Line 5:		Line 5:

	::As I understand it, Captain Dread ''is'' the one who sunk Old Maraqua to the bottom of the sea. That was how history wrote out. And yet the plot with New Maraqua confuses things, almost as if they are trying to [[Wikipedia:Retroactive continuity\|retcon]] the whole event, as I believe Scarblade mentions of finishing what he started in the comics. So there is good reason for the confusion. However, to ignore the fact that it was indeed Dread who originally sunk the city cannot and will not be ignored. I propose a section if each article to speak on this confusion. --[[User:Jacob\|Jacob]] 14:11, 21 October 2009 (UTC)		::As I understand it, Captain Dread ''is'' the one who sunk Old Maraqua to the bottom of the sea. That was how history wrote out. And yet the plot with New Maraqua confuses things, almost as if they are trying to [[Wikipedia:Retroactive continuity\|retcon]] the whole event, as I believe Scarblade mentions of finishing what he started in the comics. So there is good reason for the confusion. However, to ignore the fact that it was indeed Dread who originally sunk the city cannot and will not be ignored. I propose a section if each article to speak on this confusion. --[[User:Jacob\|Jacob]] 14:11, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

			Hmm he does raise a good point there.. I think tll see what the TNT say about it..--[[Special:Contributions/76.219.254.104\|76.219.254.104]] 02:46, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

Jacob: my understanding of it all

2009-10-21T14:11:02Z

my understanding of it all

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:11, 21 October 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:
	This is regarding your edits on the [[Captain Scarblade]] article. [[Captain Dread]] did in fact attack Old Maraqua - Scarblade did not exist until New Maraqua appears. Scarblade was continuing what Dread did not manage to destroy years ago. Please refer to [[The Destruction of Maraqua]]. --[[User:SwordFire\|SwordFire]] <sup>( [[User talk:SwordFire\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/SwordFire\|contrib]] )</sup> 15:14, 6 June 2009 (UTC)		This is regarding your edits on the [[Captain Scarblade]] article. [[Captain Dread]] did in fact attack Old Maraqua - Scarblade did not exist until New Maraqua appears. Scarblade was continuing what Dread did not manage to destroy years ago. Please refer to [[The Destruction of Maraqua]]. --[[User:SwordFire\|SwordFire]] <sup>( [[User talk:SwordFire\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/SwordFire\|contrib]] )</sup> 15:14, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

	Uhh No. Dread is an Outdated version of Scarblade and I can show evidince. They are both Pirates. They both have a ship called the revenge. They both hate Maraqua. Why would Scarblade just attack for no reason? Also, Dread is not in the gallery of evil. In fact Dread completely vanished from Neopian History after Scarblade came along.		:Uhh No. Dread is an Outdated version of Scarblade and I can show evidince. They are both Pirates. They both have a ship called the revenge. They both hate Maraqua. Why would Scarblade just attack for no reason? Also, Dread is not in the gallery of evil. In fact Dread completely vanished from Neopian History after Scarblade came along. {{sign\|76.219.254.104}}

			::As I understand it, Captain Dread ''is'' the one who sunk Old Maraqua to the bottom of the sea. That was how history wrote out. And yet the plot with New Maraqua confuses things, almost as if they are trying to [[Wikipedia:Retroactive continuity\|retcon]] the whole event, as I believe Scarblade mentions of finishing what he started in the comics. So there is good reason for the confusion. However, to ignore the fact that it was indeed Dread who originally sunk the city cannot and will not be ignored. I propose a section if each article to speak on this confusion. --[[User:Jacob\|Jacob]] 14:11, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

76.219.254.104: /* Captain Scarblade */

2009-10-18T15:40:35Z

Captain Scarblade

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:40, 18 October 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:
	This is regarding your edits on the [[Captain Scarblade]] article. [[Captain Dread]] did in fact attack Old Maraqua - Scarblade did not exist until New Maraqua appears. Scarblade was continuing what Dread did not manage to destroy years ago. Please refer to [[The Destruction of Maraqua]]. --[[User:SwordFire\|SwordFire]] <sup>( [[User talk:SwordFire\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/SwordFire\|contrib]] )</sup> 15:14, 6 June 2009 (UTC)		This is regarding your edits on the [[Captain Scarblade]] article. [[Captain Dread]] did in fact attack Old Maraqua - Scarblade did not exist until New Maraqua appears. Scarblade was continuing what Dread did not manage to destroy years ago. Please refer to [[The Destruction of Maraqua]]. --[[User:SwordFire\|SwordFire]] <sup>( [[User talk:SwordFire\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/SwordFire\|contrib]] )</sup> 15:14, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

	Uhh No. Dread is an Outdated version of Scarblade and I can show evidince. They are both Pirates. They both have a ship called the revenge. They both ~~hare~~ Maraqua. Why would Scarblade just attack for no reason? Also, Dread is not in the gallery of evil. I fact Dread completely vanished from Neopian History after Scarblade came along.		Uhh No. Dread is an Outdated version of Scarblade and I can show evidince. They are both Pirates. They both have a ship called the revenge. They both hate Maraqua. Why would Scarblade just attack for no reason? Also, Dread is not in the gallery of evil. In fact Dread completely vanished from Neopian History after Scarblade came along.

76.219.254.104: /* Captain Scarblade */

2009-10-18T15:37:03Z

Captain Scarblade

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:37, 18 October 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Captain Scarblade==		==Captain Scarblade==
	This is regarding your edits on the [[Captain Scarblade]] article. [[Captain Dread]] did in fact attack Old Maraqua - Scarblade did not exist until New Maraqua appears. Scarblade was continuing what Dread did not manage to destroy years ago. Please refer to [[The Destruction of Maraqua]]. --[[User:SwordFire\|SwordFire]] <sup>( [[User talk:SwordFire\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/SwordFire\|contrib]] )</sup> 15:14, 6 June 2009 (UTC)		This is regarding your edits on the [[Captain Scarblade]] article. [[Captain Dread]] did in fact attack Old Maraqua - Scarblade did not exist until New Maraqua appears. Scarblade was continuing what Dread did not manage to destroy years ago. Please refer to [[The Destruction of Maraqua]]. --[[User:SwordFire\|SwordFire]] <sup>( [[User talk:SwordFire\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/SwordFire\|contrib]] )</sup> 15:14, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

			Uhh No. Dread is an Outdated version of Scarblade and I can show evidince. They are both Pirates. They both have a ship called the revenge. They both hare Maraqua. Why would Scarblade just attack for no reason? Also, Dread is not in the gallery of evil. I fact Dread completely vanished from Neopian History after Scarblade came along.

SwordFire: New page: ==Captain Scarblade== This is regarding your edits on the Captain Scarblade article. Captain Dread did in fact attack Old Maraqua - Scarblade did not exist until New Maraqua appear...

2009-06-06T15:14:40Z

New page: ==Captain Scarblade== This is regarding your edits on the Captain Scarblade article. Captain Dread did in fact attack Old Maraqua - Scarblade did not exist until New Maraqua appear...

New page

==Captain Scarblade==
This is regarding your edits on the [[Captain Scarblade]] article. [[Captain Dread]] did in fact attack Old Maraqua - Scarblade did not exist until New Maraqua appears. Scarblade was continuing what Dread did not manage to destroy years ago. Please refer to [[The Destruction of Maraqua]]. --[[User:SwordFire|SwordFire]] <sup>( [[User talk:SwordFire|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/SwordFire|contrib]] )</sup> 15:14, 6 June 2009 (UTC)