Talk:National Neopian Bank - Revision history

Emeraldosprey: Reverted edits by 213.5.71.155 (talk) to last revision by Cath

2011-02-19T13:30:00Z

Reverted edits by 213.5.71.155 (talk) to last revision by Cath

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:30, 19 February 2011
Line 14:		Line 14:

	:::As I said, you're not actually getting the lower rate. The lower rate said I was supposed to get only 2114 NP, but I got 2315 instead. The change was actually made starting the evening of the 31st and has persisted despite the removal of the other April Fool's stuff. Of course, I can't guarantee that it's just a joke but I'm guessing that if they really meant it, you'd only be getting the lower amound. -[[User:Cath\|Cath]] 13:57, 2 April 2009 (UTC)		:::As I said, you're not actually getting the lower rate. The lower rate said I was supposed to get only 2114 NP, but I got 2315 instead. The change was actually made starting the evening of the 31st and has persisted despite the removal of the other April Fool's stuff. Of course, I can't guarantee that it's just a joke but I'm guessing that if they really meant it, you'd only be getting the lower amound. -[[User:Cath\|Cath]] 13:57, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

	~~== Mortgage rates headed down - time to refi? ==~~

	~~Anyone else thinking of re-financing the mortgage at the new low rates this morning? I'm seeing some 5.30 APRs for 30yr fixed w/ 0 points.~~

213.5.71.155: /* Mortgage rates headed down - time to refi? */ new section

2011-02-19T12:13:27Z

Mortgage rates headed down - time to refi?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:13, 19 February 2011
Line 14:		Line 14:

	:::As I said, you're not actually getting the lower rate. The lower rate said I was supposed to get only 2114 NP, but I got 2315 instead. The change was actually made starting the evening of the 31st and has persisted despite the removal of the other April Fool's stuff. Of course, I can't guarantee that it's just a joke but I'm guessing that if they really meant it, you'd only be getting the lower amound. -[[User:Cath\|Cath]] 13:57, 2 April 2009 (UTC)		:::As I said, you're not actually getting the lower rate. The lower rate said I was supposed to get only 2114 NP, but I got 2315 instead. The change was actually made starting the evening of the 31st and has persisted despite the removal of the other April Fool's stuff. Of course, I can't guarantee that it's just a joke but I'm guessing that if they really meant it, you'd only be getting the lower amound. -[[User:Cath\|Cath]] 13:57, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

			== Mortgage rates headed down - time to refi? ==

			Anyone else thinking of re-financing the mortgage at the new low rates this morning? I'm seeing some 5.30 APRs for 30yr fixed w/ 0 points.

Cath: /* Edited for Clarity */ Response to question

2009-04-02T13:57:12Z

Edited for Clarity: Response to question

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:57, 2 April 2009
Line 12:		Line 12:

	::It's now April 2nd in Australia and I'm still getting the lower interest rate. Was it really just for April fools day, or is it permanent. I was at 11.5% and I'm now at 10.5%. -sam.		::It's now April 2nd in Australia and I'm still getting the lower interest rate. Was it really just for April fools day, or is it permanent. I was at 11.5% and I'm now at 10.5%. -sam.

			:::As I said, you're not actually getting the lower rate. The lower rate said I was supposed to get only 2114 NP, but I got 2315 instead. The change was actually made starting the evening of the 31st and has persisted despite the removal of the other April Fool's stuff. Of course, I can't guarantee that it's just a joke but I'm guessing that if they really meant it, you'd only be getting the lower amound. -[[User:Cath\|Cath]] 13:57, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

124.189.209.225 at 10:21, 2 April 2009

2009-04-02T10:21:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:21, 2 April 2009
Line 11:		Line 11:
	:Actually not random... they were dropped by one point each. The drop was only in the numbers, though, not real. A user still got the NP they should have gotten. :) -[[User:Cath\|Cath]] 08:15, 2 April 2009 (UTC)		:Actually not random... they were dropped by one point each. The drop was only in the numbers, though, not real. A user still got the NP they should have gotten. :) -[[User:Cath\|Cath]] 08:15, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

	::It's now April 2nd in Australia and I'm still getting the lower interest rate. Was it really just for April fools day, or is it permanent. I was at 11.5% and I'm now at 10.5%.		::It's now April 2nd in Australia and I'm still getting the lower interest rate. Was it really just for April fools day, or is it permanent. I was at 11.5% and I'm now at 10.5%. -sam.

124.189.209.225: bank interest rates?

2009-04-02T10:21:22Z

bank interest rates?

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:21, 2 April 2009
Line 10:		Line 10:

	:Actually not random... they were dropped by one point each. The drop was only in the numbers, though, not real. A user still got the NP they should have gotten. :) -[[User:Cath\|Cath]] 08:15, 2 April 2009 (UTC)		:Actually not random... they were dropped by one point each. The drop was only in the numbers, though, not real. A user still got the NP they should have gotten. :) -[[User:Cath\|Cath]] 08:15, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

			::It's now April 2nd in Australia and I'm still getting the lower interest rate. Was it really just for April fools day, or is it permanent. I was at 11.5% and I'm now at 10.5%.

Cath: /* Edited for Clarity */

2009-04-02T08:15:51Z

Edited for Clarity

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:15, 2 April 2009
Line 8:		Line 8:

	On April 1st, 2009, as part of the TNT April Fools Day joke, they randomly changed interest rates on bank accounts.		On April 1st, 2009, as part of the TNT April Fools Day joke, they randomly changed interest rates on bank accounts.

			:Actually not random... they were dropped by one point each. The drop was only in the numbers, though, not real. A user still got the NP they should have gotten. :) -[[User:Cath\|Cath]] 08:15, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

24.16.104.250: Noted the April Fools Day joke related to bank interest.

2009-04-01T18:23:10Z

Noted the April Fools Day joke related to bank interest.

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:23, 1 April 2009
Line 6:		Line 6:

	:I wondered about the information myself and if it should be here, due to the fact users can figure maths for themselves...though I suppose it's interesting to note. and yes, does need to be looked over, as with the rest of the article. It's on my watchlist. ;) --[[User:Jacob\|Jacob]] 15:45, 21 Sep 2007 (UTC)		:I wondered about the information myself and if it should be here, due to the fact users can figure maths for themselves...though I suppose it's interesting to note. and yes, does need to be looked over, as with the rest of the article. It's on my watchlist. ;) --[[User:Jacob\|Jacob]] 15:45, 21 Sep 2007 (UTC)

			On April 1st, 2009, as part of the TNT April Fools Day joke, they randomly changed interest rates on bank accounts.

SwordFire: Reverted edits by 195.229.235.41 (Talk); changed back to last version by Jacob

2008-10-30T12:30:52Z

Reverted edits by 195.229.235.41 (Talk); changed back to last version by Jacob

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:30, 30 October 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~i yont 7 millon~~		The Bank now has the Diamond Deposit Plus at 1/4 million and the Gold level at 1/2 million. I am not there yet so I don't know the interest rate. Please help provide these numbers. Thanks. [[User:Lobster101\|Lobster101]] 21:22, 26 Jan 2007 (CST)
			:Done. --[[User:Macbeth\|Macbeth]] 06:53, 27 Jan 2007 (CST)

			==Edited for Clarity==
			I hope this conveys what was meant. It took me several read-throughs to understand the usefulness of the information provided. I'm still considering whether the chart would be better served with the APR as the left column. -[[User:Cath\|Cath]] 13:45, 21 Sep 2007 (UTC)

			:I wondered about the information myself and if it should be here, due to the fact users can figure maths for themselves...though I suppose it's interesting to note. and yes, does need to be looked over, as with the rest of the article. It's on my watchlist. ;) --[[User:Jacob\|Jacob]] 15:45, 21 Sep 2007 (UTC)

195.229.235.41: Replacing page with 'i yont 7 millon'

2008-10-30T05:27:33Z

Replacing page with 'i yont 7 millon'

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:27, 30 October 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The Bank now has the Diamond Deposit Plus at 1/4 million and the Gold level at 1/2 million. I am not there yet so I don't know the interest rate. Please help provide these numbers. Thanks. [[User:Lobster101\|Lobster101]] 21:22, 26 Jan 2007 (CST)		i yont 7 millon
	~~:Done. --[[User:Macbeth\|Macbeth]] 06:53, 27 Jan 2007 (CST)~~

	~~==Edited for Clarity==~~
	I hope this conveys what was meant. It took me several read-throughs to understand the usefulness of the information provided. I'm still considering whether the chart would be better served with the APR as the left column. -[[User:Cath\|Cath]] 13:45, 21 Sep 2007 (UTC)

	:I wondered about the information myself and if it should be here, due to the fact users can figure maths for themselves...though I suppose it's interesting to note. and yes, does need to be looked over, as with the rest of the article. It's on my watchlist. ;) --[[User:Jacob\|Jacob]] 15:45, 21 Sep 2007 (UTC)

Jacob: /* Edited for Clarity */

2007-09-21T15:45:09Z

Edited for Clarity

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:45, 21 September 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:
	==Edited for Clarity==		==Edited for Clarity==
	I hope this conveys what was meant. It took me several read-throughs to understand the usefulness of the information provided. I'm still considering whether the chart would be better served with the APR as the left column. -[[User:Cath\|Cath]] 13:45, 21 Sep 2007 (UTC)		I hope this conveys what was meant. It took me several read-throughs to understand the usefulness of the information provided. I'm still considering whether the chart would be better served with the APR as the left column. -[[User:Cath\|Cath]] 13:45, 21 Sep 2007 (UTC)

			:I wondered about the information myself and if it should be here, due to the fact users can figure maths for themselves...though I suppose it's interesting to note. and yes, does need to be looked over, as with the rest of the article. It's on my watchlist. ;) --[[User:Jacob\|Jacob]] 15:45, 21 Sep 2007 (UTC)