Right. *takes breath* Chris, you’re a great friend, but for the love of god, please, get over it.
The truth? I started to suspect you as soon as you even mentioned the fact that dead people were talking about who they suspect. There’s no rule saying they can’t, and nobody has to believe them. However, I didn’t say anything for fear of either being killed, or accused myself.
Sure, you may be right about a chance at getting two wolves. But there’s the key word – chance. It’s not definite. Like I’ve said before, at this stage of the game, we don’t want to lose any more innocents than is absolutely necessary.
And seriously. You were the one who came out and admitted your guilt. Nobody forced you to. You did that of your own accord, so I don’t think it’s fair to blame the ‘dead’. Does it matter whether they were talking or not? No.
okamotosan18 wrote:
That's so sad if Alex explained it better than you could since her explanation only said she wanted to throw away two chances of getting rid of wolf, and letting the wolves get a free shot tonight.
Thankyou dear. I didn’t say that I wanted to throw away chances of getting rid of a wolf. I’m saying that I want to
throw away the risk of losing more innocents than is necessary. What proof do you have that you will be able to kill a wolf? You may very well kill off another innocent.
*shrug* Either way, I hope you realize that it’s too late to change the minds of the innocents anyway, since there’s only half an hour left until execution. Which means that there’s only the possibility of one wolf going. Which isn’t going to happen, since a majority has already been reached. Therefore, we will get rid of one bad guy, and lose an innocent – the best case scenario this late in the day/game.