Sun Jul 18, 2004 4:27 pm
xaviersxmen wrote:She isnt takiung her time she is sticking her nose into other countrys affairs.
I find that comment incredibly rude and foolish. If you'd rather have a fantasy book out than children in need helped, then you really DO need to sort out your priorities.
I don't care when it comes out. If more important things come up, I think Rowling should do them before writing a book about something that isn't even real.
Sun Jul 18, 2004 6:05 pm
Dawn2 wrote:xaviersxmen wrote:She isnt takiung her time she is sticking her nose into other countrys affairs.
I find that comment incredibly rude and foolish. If you'd rather have a fantasy book out than children in need helped, then you really DO need to sort out your priorities.
I don't care when it comes out. If more important things come up, I think Rowling should do them before writing a book about something that isn't even real.
*applauds dawn* Well said!
xaviersxmen wrote:jellyoflight wrote:xaviersxmen wrote:They both cant die. The profocy said one will live and the other will die by the others hand. Its not Tom riddle because thats the same person come on she wasNT talking bettween the lines.
1) Not Harry
2)Not the Dark lord.
3) what luck would it be to be hagrid with only one human parent?
4) NONE of the weaslys because full blooded can be tracked from the begining. Thats what that thing on the wall at Blacks house was(in the book). It was a family tree tracked back from the begining and all full blooded familys would have that.
5) Not Hurminoe because she has muggle parents(not squib!)
So who does that leave? Dumbldor, because we know little about him. All we know is he was from Griffendor. Plus we that know the books know he is a powerful wizard.
No one would get that house elf he would most likely kill himself because of his loyalty.
Don't you remember in the 2nd book, where Dobby gave harry the warning, and stated that it wasn't voldemort. And it turned out to be Tom Riddle?
But that was Tom riddle. But now all that was Tom riddle is now gone.
Actually, he isn't gone. He lives on, he's vodemort. Just because the memory of him is gone, doesn't mean that he is.
Sun Jul 18, 2004 6:11 pm
I wasnt talking about her helping kids.
Sun Jul 18, 2004 6:14 pm
xaviersxmen wrote:I wasnt talking about her helping kids.
That's what she was doing in the Czech Republic. And I'm assuming that's what you meant when you said she was 'sticking her nose in other countries business'.
Sun Jul 18, 2004 6:20 pm
I didnt read that it was kids in them caged beds.
Sun Jul 18, 2004 6:21 pm
xaviersxmen wrote:I didnt read that it was kids in them caged beds.
It was.. And I'm glad she did something about it
Sun Jul 18, 2004 6:33 pm
I guess the story I read didnt have all the facts. But when they talk about ill people in the mind you dont think about kids. 
Sun Jul 18, 2004 7:03 pm
Mark wrote:xaviersxmen wrote:Im ready for her to get done with this book anyway or another.
No one is sure exactly how far she is.
But I'm glad she's taking her time. Although, if she would hurry up..
But after this book, only one more
You do know that she is making three more after this one? One for Year Seven and two of Harry's after life.
Sun Jul 18, 2004 7:07 pm
Where did you hear that from?
Sun Jul 18, 2004 7:08 pm
Ammer wrote:Mark wrote:xaviersxmen wrote:Im ready for her to get done with this book anyway or another.
No one is sure exactly how far she is.
But I'm glad she's taking her time. Although, if she would hurry up..
But after this book, only one more
You do know that she is making three more after this one? One for Year Seven and two of Harry's after life.
Where did you get this info? She said she wants to move on after book 7.
Sun Jul 18, 2004 7:10 pm
Yeah this is way new news to me and if the public knew we would have read it somewhere.
Sun Jul 18, 2004 8:27 pm
Mark wrote:Ammer wrote:Mark wrote:xaviersxmen wrote:Im ready for her to get done with this book anyway or another.
No one is sure exactly how far she is.
But I'm glad she's taking her time. Although, if she would hurry up..
But after this book, only one more
You do know that she is making three more after this one? One for Year Seven and two of Harry's after life.
Where did you get this info? She said she wants to move on after book 7.
It was on an interview my sister saw however she said she might be doing two more books if all goes well. I assumed everything at the moment for her is going well therefore why not make two more books?
Sun Jul 18, 2004 8:33 pm
Ammer wrote:Mark wrote:Ammer wrote:Mark wrote:xaviersxmen wrote:Im ready for her to get done with this book anyway or another.
No one is sure exactly how far she is.
But I'm glad she's taking her time. Although, if she would hurry up..
But after this book, only one more
You do know that she is making three more after this one? One for Year Seven and two of Harry's after life.
Where did you get this info? She said she wants to move on after book 7.
It was on an interview my sister saw however she said she might be doing two more books if all goes well. I assumed everything at the moment for her is going well therefore why not make two more books?
But she's definitely said she is stopping at 7. And besides, we don't even know if Harry will live. So why make two more books if he's dead? lol
Sun Jul 18, 2004 8:58 pm
Yeah, I dont think she would give that out.
Sun Jul 18, 2004 9:39 pm
Ammer wrote:You do know that she is making three more after this one? One for Year Seven and two of Harry's after life.
Ammer said 'After life'. That means Harry's a ghost, obviously.
