Sun Aug 22, 2004 5:25 am
Sun Aug 22, 2004 11:35 am
Sun Aug 22, 2004 11:55 am
Sun Aug 22, 2004 12:11 pm
Sun Aug 22, 2004 12:21 pm
Sun Aug 22, 2004 12:49 pm
Sun Aug 22, 2004 3:20 pm
Christopher wrote:If they are going to cut so much out of a movie why bother making it at all? The only exception beign SPEW, event though it is vaguely important It just too irritating for me.
Sun Aug 22, 2004 3:27 pm
Mark wrote:Christopher wrote:If they are going to cut so much out of a movie why bother making it at all? The only exception beign SPEW, event though it is vaguely important It just too irritating for me.
Because it's just not possible to follow a book line for line. It would be 18 hours long. They need to cut things they feel fit. Personally, I haven't had any problems with them cutting anything fro the first 3 movies, with the exception of the Sorting Hat Song (I just really wanted to see that), the Deathday Party, and the explaniation about the Maurader's Map in movie 3.
Sun Aug 22, 2004 6:37 pm
Stijn wrote:Mark wrote:Christopher wrote:If they are going to cut so much out of a movie why bother making it at all? The only exception beign SPEW, event though it is vaguely important It just too irritating for me.
Because it's just not possible to follow a book line for line. It would be 18 hours long. They need to cut things they feel fit. Personally, I haven't had any problems with them cutting anything fro the first 3 movies, with the exception of the Sorting Hat Song (I just really wanted to see that), the Deathday Party, and the explaniation about the Maurader's Map in movie 3.
It is possible to follow the book, even if it's not line for line. (which would also be possible) So what if it is 18 hours long? Sure, making the movie would be a lot more expensive. But they would earn all of it back anyway.
It's about profit, not about the fans.
Sun Aug 22, 2004 8:56 pm
Stijn wrote:Mark wrote:Christopher wrote:If they are going to cut so much out of a movie why bother making it at all? The only exception beign SPEW, event though it is vaguely important It just too irritating for me.
Because it's just not possible to follow a book line for line. It would be 18 hours long. They need to cut things they feel fit. Personally, I haven't had any problems with them cutting anything fro the first 3 movies, with the exception of the Sorting Hat Song (I just really wanted to see that), the Deathday Party, and the explaniation about the Maurader's Map in movie 3.
It is possible to follow the book, even if it's not line for line. (which would also be possible) So what if it is 18 hours long? Sure, making the movie would be a lot more expensive. But they would earn all of it back anyway.
It's about profit, not about the fans.
Sun Aug 22, 2004 9:06 pm
Sun Aug 22, 2004 10:49 pm
Skullsplitter wrote:I saw some eastern guy reading a harry potter book with an odd dark blue-weird cover, is that just how book 5 or whatever looks in japan or something?
Mon Aug 23, 2004 1:44 am
Mon Aug 23, 2004 3:18 am
Mon Aug 23, 2004 9:04 pm
...Alex wrote:...Twitchy, you are aware that both of those interviews are from before OotP, right? One's an interview before GoF, too.
Er. Anyway.
New GoF film news. Though it is unconfirmed, it sounds realistic, if disappointing.
(Following copied and pasted from this HPANA page)
What's been cut:
The SPEW storyline
Opening scene with the Dursley’s
The Hogwarts express (there are shots of it, but nothing in the train,)
The wand weighing
What's still in:
Creepy opening scene with Voldemort, Wormtail and Nagini
The Dark Mark scene
The "Potter Stinks" bit, the skrewts, the horntail challenge
The merpeople challenge
The final challenge, although the spider may NOT be in it
The Sphinx, Dobby, Winky, the Portkeys, Crouch freaking out, the Pensieve scene and Cedric's end
Things that are drastically cut:
Yule Ball
Quidditch World Cup
Rita Skeeter stuff
Harry stressing over the egg clue
Snape scenes
Hagrid & Maxine love story (it's there, but just reduced to a few brief moments for humor)
Dumbledore's humor
SPEW's been cut. It's been <i>cut</i>. WHY? Perhaps it wasn't important to the plot, but hello. It at least made Hermione more Hermione. Unlike that Mary Sue creature that emerged in PoA. >_>
Hagrid and Maxime's romance has been mostly cut? Again, why? It won't make any sense when the two bring back Grawp, as they'll barely know each other, for the sake of humour. And how will Rita discover Hagrid's giant secret (literally), if the love story's only humour?
They left in Potter Stinks and the Sphinx, yet they cut SPEW, the Dursley's, most of the World Cup, and most of the Yule Ball (no Pansy, Parvati or Padma, so why even bother filming it?).
And why have they cut out the majority of Dumbledore's humour? The reason he's Dumbledore is because he's an old guy with a sense of humour, and a great deal of optimism. The optimism and humour go hand in hand. What'll they do now? Have him walk around the school telling everyone they're going to die, and that the filthy mudbloods will be killed first?
Other than those things, I'm fine with the other cuts.