Jrtman, you don't sound very informative on Revolution, and rather fanboyish so I guess I'll put things into perspective. (heck, anyone that's read up on this at all could disprove most of what you've said.)
jrtman wrote:
But the Wii's capabilities won't be nowhere near as advanced as the PS3 or 360 so it won't be winning no prizes when it comes to graphics.
This is a reason that new gamers are dragging video games down the crapper.
Who cares about the freaking graphics!? I don't play games just because the graphics are nice (and those that do are fools). If you haven't noticed, the 360 is way off of the PS3's graphics as well, and actually quite close to the Rev's capabilities. People play games they find fun or interesting, not those that look the coolest.
Aside from multi-platform titles, I really am not interested in the 360 at all, yet it has nice graphics. Luckily, the PS3 already looks to have as great of a library as ever, but also great graphics. Graphics mean nothing if your library sucks.
Fin.
jrtman wrote:
The new controller appears like a big pain in the neck to me, if I wanted to use a remote contorl to play games I'd subscribe to the game service Dish Network offers.
Fair point, I guess, though it really wasn't explained past the point of "I just don't like it."
jrtman wrote:
The Wii is going to be the Gamecube relived. Third-party games won't come to it because of the lack of power and now the controller so you'll have to play 1st party games of which there will be too many "kid friendlies" and not enough with adult / young adult appeal.
WRONG. This is where common sense take flight. First of all, if you haven't noticed or read up on anything, the Revolution is actually getting a huge gain in 3rd party support, in fact, it's very first game is 3rd party.
How powerful your system is has absolutely no effect on how much 3rd party support you get... at all. If anything, the PS3 is going to be the most difficult to provide games for because of it's Blu-Ray format.
Oh, and if you haven't noticed, the very first game being released is anything but "kiddy" (though the GC was). The 3rd Party support that I already mentioned already disproves that.
jrtman wrote:
I predict, though I'm could be wrong, that Nintendo is going to go the way of Sega and not even try to release another console after this one. They'll still continue to make hand-helds I'm sure of that, but I don't know how long they can exist after that.
I know the death of Nintendo has been argued to death, but I have a feeling it may be happening within the next 10 years.
Nope... that's nearly impossible, actually. As long as they make another console, then they will last longer than 10 years (take into account the life of a current generation system, it's about 5 years), in fact, the only way I can see Nintendo going out of business is if they don't even release the Revolution and have a terrible time with their handhelds. It just won't happen. o_o
(and I'm still not using the stupid Wii name)
Icey - It's not just a name. A name can greatly affect those that are thinking of purchasing the product. You wouldn't buy a bottle of shampoo called " 'Poo " would you? Of course we know what it is, but some feel kind of stupid for having something named that in their posession (though some would find it amusing). As far as products and economics go, a name is never just a name, it's a ticket to sales.