Difference between revisions of "Talk:Mr. Krawley"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Elephante== | ==Elephante== | ||
Mr Krawley was the elephante? --[[User:Macbeth|Macbeth]] 10:40, 7 Jan 2007 (CST) | |||
:Yes, he was...or i would believe it is so given the information (Neopets isn't outright saying it as with a lot of things). Take a look at the eyes of Mr. Krawley and the Pink Elephante. Also, click on the Red Wocky gypsy of the image where the Elephante used to be, and you will find there never was an Elephante part of their group, i.e. someone (Mr. Krawley?) was posing as one. | |||
:Complicated? It adds a new depth to the story, and makes you wonder why Krawley did what he did (as he was the cause and the cure of the events). Will only learn in the future why it all worked out as it did... --[[User:Jacob|Jacob]] 11:09, 7 Jan 2007 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 17:09, 7 January 2007
Elephante
Mr Krawley was the elephante? --Macbeth 10:40, 7 Jan 2007 (CST)
- Yes, he was...or i would believe it is so given the information (Neopets isn't outright saying it as with a lot of things). Take a look at the eyes of Mr. Krawley and the Pink Elephante. Also, click on the Red Wocky gypsy of the image where the Elephante used to be, and you will find there never was an Elephante part of their group, i.e. someone (Mr. Krawley?) was posing as one.
- Complicated? It adds a new depth to the story, and makes you wonder why Krawley did what he did (as he was the cause and the cure of the events). Will only learn in the future why it all worked out as it did... --Jacob 11:09, 7 Jan 2007 (CST)