Difference between revisions of "Talk:The Rainbow Pool"
(→Articles for each Colour?: Respond) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
==Articles for each Colour?== | ==Articles for each Colour?== | ||
Lately, I've been having fun going through and creating articles for each Neopet Colour. (See [[Spotted]] and [[Biscuit]].) I was wondering if this is in line with the "spirit of Neodex" or if this is frivolous and useless information. What do you guys think? --[[User:Emeraldosprey|Emeraldosprey]] | Lately, I've been having fun going through and creating articles for each Neopet Colour. (See [[Spotted]] and [[Biscuit]].) I was wondering if this is in line with the "spirit of Neodex" or if this is frivolous and useless information. What do you guys think? --[[User:Emeraldosprey|Emeraldosprey]] | ||
:Currently I do not have any issue with the new articles you have created. so long as you keep it to those noteworthy colours. Remember to categorize the article. --[[User:SwordFire|SwordFire]] <sup>( [[User talk:SwordFire|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/SwordFire|contrib]] )</sup> 09:50, 31 May 2008 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 14:50, 31 May 2008
Alphabetize Petpet List Too?
Notice the difference in the colour lists for Neopet and Petpet? Petpet isn't alphabetized. the reason being i just copied and pasted from the source of the list on Neopets, and the petpet list there isn't sorted like the Neopet one. I think it works by putting the newest petpet colour at the bottom, and that would be Darigan (or am i wrong on that?). In either case, shall the list be a direct copy of that found on neopets, or be alphabetized? All petpet pages showing colours shall correspond to the method we choose. --Jacob 17:06, 2 Dec 2006 (CST)
- Yes, it should also be alphabetized for the sake of continuity --Dizzy 13:22, 15 May 2007 (CDT)
Articles for each Colour?
Lately, I've been having fun going through and creating articles for each Neopet Colour. (See Spotted and Biscuit.) I was wondering if this is in line with the "spirit of Neodex" or if this is frivolous and useless information. What do you guys think? --Emeraldosprey