Talk:Mr. Krawley - Revision history

Dizzy: Talk:Clifford Crawley moved to Talk:Mr. Krawley: reverted vandalism

2010-04-25T20:14:53Z

Talk:Clifford Crawley moved to Talk:Mr. Krawley: reverted vandalism

← Older revision	Revision as of 20:14, 25 April 2010
(No difference)

A NeezIes A: Talk:Mr. Crawley moved to Talk:Clifford Crawley

2010-04-25T18:55:50Z

Talk:Mr. Crawley moved to Talk:Clifford Crawley

← Older revision	Revision as of 18:55, 25 April 2010
(No difference)

A NeezIes A: Talk:Mr. Krawley moved to Talk:Mr. Crawley

2010-04-25T18:55:40Z

Talk:Mr. Krawley moved to Talk:Mr. Crawley

← Older revision	Revision as of 18:55, 25 April 2010
(No difference)

Xweetok at 01:57, 20 December 2007

2007-12-20T01:57:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:57, 20 December 2007
Line 19:		Line 19:

	::If you could do that, it would be awesome. :) --[[User:Jacob\|Jacob]] 01:52, 18 Dec 2007 (UTC)		::If you could do that, it would be awesome. :) --[[User:Jacob\|Jacob]] 01:52, 18 Dec 2007 (UTC)

			::: Ok, I found a new image. It's from the ToW theme, twards the bottem. He's standing in a white background holding a bottle of hissi oil. The only problem I fond with it is it only shows his head and waist; the rest of his body is cut off. Which one do you guys think is better? (I can still take out the back of the TCG Card) [[User:Xweetok\|Xweetok]] 08:56, 19 Dec 2007

Jacob: /* Article image */

2007-12-18T01:52:03Z

Article image

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:52, 18 December 2007
Line 16:		Line 16:
	The current image which has been uploaded for this article is the Neopets TCG card of Krawley. While that's fine and all, if a better image should come around (one that doesn't show it to be a TCG card), I think it would be best to use that other image. No, this does not mean take the image down. Just saying it's fine till another one comes along. winks at editor who uploaded it --[[User:Jacob\|Jacob]] 21:46, 17 Dec 2007 (UTC)		The current image which has been uploaded for this article is the Neopets TCG card of Krawley. While that's fine and all, if a better image should come around (one that doesn't show it to be a TCG card), I think it would be best to use that other image. No, this does not mean take the image down. Just saying it's fine till another one comes along. winks at editor who uploaded it --[[User:Jacob\|Jacob]] 21:46, 17 Dec 2007 (UTC)

	I uploaded it, and I could put it onto paint and cut out the picture of krawley, only ~~reveiling~~ his picture and not the TCG if you want. [[Xweetok\|Xweetok]] 06:01, 17 dec 2007 (UTC)		:I uploaded it, and I could put it onto paint and cut out the picture of krawley, only revealing his picture and not the TCG if you want. [[Xweetok\|Xweetok]] 06:01, 17 dec 2007 (UTC)

			::If you could do that, it would be awesome. :) --[[User:Jacob\|Jacob]] 01:52, 18 Dec 2007 (UTC)

Xweetok at 23:01, 17 December 2007

2007-12-17T23:01:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:01, 17 December 2007
Line 15:		Line 15:
	==Article image==		==Article image==
	The current image which has been uploaded for this article is the Neopets TCG card of Krawley. While that's fine and all, if a better image should come around (one that doesn't show it to be a TCG card), I think it would be best to use that other image. No, this does not mean take the image down. Just saying it's fine till another one comes along. winks at editor who uploaded it --[[User:Jacob\|Jacob]] 21:46, 17 Dec 2007 (UTC)		The current image which has been uploaded for this article is the Neopets TCG card of Krawley. While that's fine and all, if a better image should come around (one that doesn't show it to be a TCG card), I think it would be best to use that other image. No, this does not mean take the image down. Just saying it's fine till another one comes along. winks at editor who uploaded it --[[User:Jacob\|Jacob]] 21:46, 17 Dec 2007 (UTC)

			I uploaded it, and I could put it onto paint and cut out the picture of krawley, only reveiling his picture and not the TCG if you want. [[Xweetok\|Xweetok]] 06:01, 17 dec 2007 (UTC)

Jacob: Article image

2007-12-17T21:46:21Z

Article image

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:46, 17 December 2007
Line 12:		Line 12:
	::Hey, this could explain why Bruno didn't revert; he has accepted the bad sides of what he had become while the others were not at peace with themselves... --[[User:213.39.195.44\|213.39.195.44]] 06:12, 8 Jan 2007 (CST)		::Hey, this could explain why Bruno didn't revert; he has accepted the bad sides of what he had become while the others were not at peace with themselves... --[[User:213.39.195.44\|213.39.195.44]] 06:12, 8 Jan 2007 (CST)
	I think it's deeper than saying Mr. Krawley wanted them to be happy with what they have. he manipulated and ruined the happiness of Sophie, making her bitter and reclusive. His methods also made the inhabitants of Neovia monsters, something they must hold with shame for a long time, and he set events which released all the inmates of Meepit Oaks as well, killing off all the staff in the process. And back to Sophie, he seems to enjoy the idea of her living alone from her family (as it seems he was smiling in that scene). There is so much unexplained, because while he caused so much pain, it was also him which lead Gilly to the cure for the village. It's like he was in control of the situation the whole time...his drama. sigh i doubt we will know why he did what he did any time soon. The mystery TNT left us will surely be good fuel for a plot of the future. --[[User:Jacob\|Jacob]] 19:41, 8 Jan 2007 (CST)		I think it's deeper than saying Mr. Krawley wanted them to be happy with what they have. he manipulated and ruined the happiness of Sophie, making her bitter and reclusive. His methods also made the inhabitants of Neovia monsters, something they must hold with shame for a long time, and he set events which released all the inmates of Meepit Oaks as well, killing off all the staff in the process. And back to Sophie, he seems to enjoy the idea of her living alone from her family (as it seems he was smiling in that scene). There is so much unexplained, because while he caused so much pain, it was also him which lead Gilly to the cure for the village. It's like he was in control of the situation the whole time...his drama. sigh i doubt we will know why he did what he did any time soon. The mystery TNT left us will surely be good fuel for a plot of the future. --[[User:Jacob\|Jacob]] 19:41, 8 Jan 2007 (CST)

			==Article image==
			The current image which has been uploaded for this article is the Neopets TCG card of Krawley. While that's fine and all, if a better image should come around (one that doesn't show it to be a TCG card), I think it would be best to use that other image. No, this does not mean take the image down. Just saying it's fine till another one comes along. winks at editor who uploaded it --[[User:Jacob\|Jacob]] 21:46, 17 Dec 2007 (UTC)

Jacob: it's more complicated than that

2007-01-09T01:41:15Z

it's more complicated than that

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:41, 9 January 2007
Line 11:		Line 11:
	:And for the record, I believe Mr Krawley did it to teach the Neovians to be happy with what they have. --[[User:Macbeth\|Macbeth]] 11:54, 7 Jan 2007 (CST)		:And for the record, I believe Mr Krawley did it to teach the Neovians to be happy with what they have. --[[User:Macbeth\|Macbeth]] 11:54, 7 Jan 2007 (CST)
	::Hey, this could explain why Bruno didn't revert; he has accepted the bad sides of what he had become while the others were not at peace with themselves... --[[User:213.39.195.44\|213.39.195.44]] 06:12, 8 Jan 2007 (CST)		::Hey, this could explain why Bruno didn't revert; he has accepted the bad sides of what he had become while the others were not at peace with themselves... --[[User:213.39.195.44\|213.39.195.44]] 06:12, 8 Jan 2007 (CST)
			I think it's deeper than saying Mr. Krawley wanted them to be happy with what they have. he manipulated and ruined the happiness of Sophie, making her bitter and reclusive. His methods also made the inhabitants of Neovia monsters, something they must hold with shame for a long time, and he set events which released all the inmates of Meepit Oaks as well, killing off all the staff in the process. And back to Sophie, he seems to enjoy the idea of her living alone from her family (as it seems he was smiling in that scene). There is so much unexplained, because while he caused so much pain, it was also him which lead Gilly to the cure for the village. It's like he was in control of the situation the whole time...his drama. sigh i doubt we will know why he did what he did any time soon. The mystery TNT left us will surely be good fuel for a plot of the future. --[[User:Jacob\|Jacob]] 19:41, 8 Jan 2007 (CST)

213.39.195.44 at 12:12, 8 January 2007

2007-01-08T12:12:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:12, 8 January 2007
Line 10:		Line 10:

	:And for the record, I believe Mr Krawley did it to teach the Neovians to be happy with what they have. --[[User:Macbeth\|Macbeth]] 11:54, 7 Jan 2007 (CST)		:And for the record, I believe Mr Krawley did it to teach the Neovians to be happy with what they have. --[[User:Macbeth\|Macbeth]] 11:54, 7 Jan 2007 (CST)
			::Hey, this could explain why Bruno didn't revert; he has accepted the bad sides of what he had become while the others were not at peace with themselves... --[[User:213.39.195.44\|213.39.195.44]] 06:12, 8 Jan 2007 (CST)

Macbeth at 17:54, 7 January 2007

2007-01-07T17:54:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:54, 7 January 2007
Line 7:		Line 7:
	::Jacob, just a question: May I use the ''ideas'' (not the exact text) given in the article for our German wiki with giving you and the Neodex credit for these? The idea Mr. Krawley might have been the elephante sounds interesting.--[[User:Himmelsdemon\|Demon]] 11:22, 7 Jan 2007 (CST)		::Jacob, just a question: May I use the ''ideas'' (not the exact text) given in the article for our German wiki with giving you and the Neodex credit for these? The idea Mr. Krawley might have been the elephante sounds interesting.--[[User:Himmelsdemon\|Demon]] 11:22, 7 Jan 2007 (CST)
	Feel free to share the information. I can't make any claim to the "discovery" of the connection between Krawley and the Elephante, as it's simply an observation from what TNT presented us...though i would be surprised if i was the first one who saw it (don't think i am). Again, feel free to spread the information, as it is something to think about. --[[User:Jacob\|Jacob]] 11:53, 7 Jan 2007 (CST)		Feel free to share the information. I can't make any claim to the "discovery" of the connection between Krawley and the Elephante, as it's simply an observation from what TNT presented us...though i would be surprised if i was the first one who saw it (don't think i am). Again, feel free to spread the information, as it is something to think about. --[[User:Jacob\|Jacob]] 11:53, 7 Jan 2007 (CST)
			:I agree, it would add an interesting level of depth. Could we move this to an 'aliases' section, or something, though, to expand on it in the article? There is a very good case for him being the Elephante.

			:And for the record, I believe Mr Krawley did it to teach the Neovians to be happy with what they have. --[[User:Macbeth\|Macbeth]] 11:54, 7 Jan 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:52, 18 December 2007
Line 16:		Line 16:
	The current image which has been uploaded for this article is the Neopets TCG card of Krawley. While that's fine and all, if a better image should come around (one that doesn't show it to be a TCG card), I think it would be best to use that other image. No, this does not mean take the image down. Just saying it's fine till another one comes along. winks at editor who uploaded it --[[User:Jacob\|Jacob]] 21:46, 17 Dec 2007 (UTC)		The current image which has been uploaded for this article is the Neopets TCG card of Krawley. While that's fine and all, if a better image should come around (one that doesn't show it to be a TCG card), I think it would be best to use that other image. No, this does not mean take the image down. Just saying it's fine till another one comes along. winks at editor who uploaded it --[[User:Jacob\|Jacob]] 21:46, 17 Dec 2007 (UTC)

	I uploaded it, and I could put it onto paint and cut out the picture of krawley, only ~~reveiling~~ his picture and not the TCG if you want. [[Xweetok\|Xweetok]] 06:01, 17 dec 2007 (UTC)		:I uploaded it, and I could put it onto paint and cut out the picture of krawley, only revealing his picture and not the TCG if you want. [[Xweetok\|Xweetok]] 06:01, 17 dec 2007 (UTC)

			::If you could do that, it would be awesome. :) --[[User:Jacob\|Jacob]] 01:52, 18 Dec 2007 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:41, 9 January 2007
Line 11:		Line 11:
	:And for the record, I believe Mr Krawley did it to teach the Neovians to be happy with what they have. --[[User:Macbeth\|Macbeth]] 11:54, 7 Jan 2007 (CST)		:And for the record, I believe Mr Krawley did it to teach the Neovians to be happy with what they have. --[[User:Macbeth\|Macbeth]] 11:54, 7 Jan 2007 (CST)
	::Hey, this could explain why Bruno didn't revert; he has accepted the bad sides of what he had become while the others were not at peace with themselves... --[[User:213.39.195.44\|213.39.195.44]] 06:12, 8 Jan 2007 (CST)		::Hey, this could explain why Bruno didn't revert; he has accepted the bad sides of what he had become while the others were not at peace with themselves... --[[User:213.39.195.44\|213.39.195.44]] 06:12, 8 Jan 2007 (CST)
			I think it's deeper than saying Mr. Krawley wanted them to be happy with what they have. he manipulated and ruined the happiness of Sophie, making her bitter and reclusive. His methods also made the inhabitants of Neovia monsters, something they must hold with shame for a long time, and he set events which released all the inmates of Meepit Oaks as well, killing off all the staff in the process. And back to Sophie, he seems to enjoy the idea of her living alone from her family (as it seems he was smiling in that scene). There is so much unexplained, because while he caused so much pain, it was also him which lead Gilly to the cure for the village. It's like he was in control of the situation the whole time...his drama. sigh i doubt we will know why he did what he did any time soon. The mystery TNT left us will surely be good fuel for a plot of the future. --[[User:Jacob\|Jacob]] 19:41, 8 Jan 2007 (CST)