WW35: Kakariko Village Graveyard (Groupies)

Mongrel · **Posted:** Sun Oct 05, 2008 5:12 pm

I'm confused. What alignment was the Skull Kid?

Dyl · **Posted:** Sun Oct 05, 2008 5:16 pm

Probably a Neutral. Possibly an OMT if it's the one from TP, but I'd guess it was the OoT one and Neutral.

Pixa · **Posted:** Sun Oct 05, 2008 5:38 pm

I dunno if I can say, considering it wasn't revealed on the thread. I was just given a lovely pink. Alas, speculate ahoy.

Raz · **Posted:** Sun Oct 05, 2008 6:22 pm

viewtopic.php?p=812717#p812717

Apparently I'm alive... but this post suggests otherwise...

UPDATE PLAYER LIST PLOX?

Miyu · **Posted:** Sun Oct 05, 2008 10:25 pm

*strangles self*

Are you kidding me?
Do you even read the plots?
Do you even read the posts?

Seriously, Weee is absolutely evil.
The lack of logic - and the quickness she is jumping on everything; and making assumptions.. either evil or an innocent who has had a few whacks to the head.

Pixa · **Posted:** Sun Oct 05, 2008 10:35 pm

Just because I was possibly evil doesn't mean my information was wrong. I didn't start off about Averly - I actually defended her in the previous cycle.

*bandwagons Miyu's logic*

~:>

*baaaaaaaa*

Mongrel · **Posted:** Mon Oct 06, 2008 2:51 am

As a playing-along-at-home non-player, I would like to recommend doing research.
For one thing, several people seem to be confusing the Skull Kid with the Skeleton attacker.
The Skull Kid looks like a scarecrow. The skeletons are more likely some sort of Stalfos-like creature.
Also, totally agreeing that Wee sounds evil. Defending someone who was dreamt evil? Encouraging people to execute inactives? Sounds evil to me.

weee5067 · **Posted:** Mon Oct 06, 2008 6:47 am

For the record, I always support killing inactives. Always

Miyu knows that, too.

Miyu · **Posted:** Mon Oct 06, 2008 7:16 am

I did that one game. I haven't done it this game.
It is this game now, who plays the exact same way every game? Not everyone. xD
But your quickness to jump on things was quite obviously evil.
Yes, killing inactives is a good strategy if you have inactive baddies.
But this game, it isn't the case. So your wanting to kill off inactives when there really isn't a solid reason to - is like.. hellllo.

Rez-banning?
Oh come on.

weee5067 · **Posted:** Mon Oct 06, 2008 7:49 am

Miyu wrote:

Yes, killing inactives is a good strategy if you have inactive baddies.

*pokes the part where Laryxler was modkilled for inactivity*

You were saying?

Hansy · **Posts:** 1 **Joined:** Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:41 pm

o.O

Hahaha, I think I know what happened there. Maybe Weee is right after all.

Siniri · **Posted:** Mon Oct 06, 2008 11:29 am

If what I think just happened really just happened, my death could have been avoided...

Well, at least a few baddies got taken out last night/today, too.

Miyu · **Posted:** Mon Oct 06, 2008 11:33 am

*huge eyeroll*

Inactive KILLING baddies.

Semantics..

Siniri · **Posted:** Mon Oct 06, 2008 3:35 pm

I think I'm smelling a rat here... or possibly a conversion.

Miyu · **Posted:** Mon Oct 06, 2008 4:47 pm

If Twizzler is who she says she is.
Then how was Averly cleared?
Doesn't that still make her a candidate for Beastliness?

Pink Poogle Toy Forum

WW35: Kakariko Village Graveyard (Groupies)

Who is online