Twinkle wrote:
Oh God no. What was the point of Venom,
really. He appeared in the last 40 minutes of the film! It was so rushed! I (being a comic book virgin practically) didn't see the evilness or twistedness of Venom, the way he's apparently meant to be portrayed. And he wasn't Venom, he was That 70's Show guy! Worst casting ever. Isn't Venom meant to be huge?!
Personally, I think the film should have been centered round Sandman and the cymbiate suit and ended when we first saw Venom, setting us up for number 4. Apparently, the director didn't want Venom in the film at all but the producer assumed that was what the public wanted. Okay, so we all wanted a incredibly rushed film where there was no depth to any of the characters at all?!
However, Sandman was badddd. Kudos to whoever cast him.
What was up with the badly directed tap dancing across the piano scene? Urgh. I did, however, enjoy the Saturday Night Fever strut down the street. Made me giggle. But why did Peter Parker suddenly turn into Emo-man? Please god, just kill the fringe!
Rant over.
Totaly agree!
They should have left when the symbiote takes over eddie and then its all set up for spiderman 4. The movie felt too rushed, i mean look how quickly it went from being all about sandman (who was a the shisnick) to new goblin to venom!
I say spousal abuse is wrong and who ever laughed when MJ got hit, tat's your own business. But i really do not like Kirsten Dunst. I find her so whiney and annoying
But I did like Tobey Maguire as an emo. I thought he looked way better all emo-fied, but personally i couldn't stop looking at the bulge in his neck from the suit. He's put on alot of weight since the first spiderman i say.
Overall rating of the film, I thought is was way better than spiderman 2 caus that was just.......BAD