theonlysaneone wrote:
Cranberry is right, the randomizer that determines which WC piece you get (as with all computer pseudo-randomizers) is broken....
Er -- why do you say that? The language library's (PHP, I think) random generator should definitely be statistically random (all outcomes equally likely without knowledge of the values the function previously spit out). PHP is very widely used, so any breakage in the library's rand() should have been caught by now. If TNT wanted it to be statistically random, I wouldn't see why they wouldn't use the built-in generator. If it isn't random, then it pretty much has to be intentional - even an incompetent programmer knows how to use rand()...