AySz88 wrote:
I strongly object to all this "I'm better than you because I didn't participate" business. In a cooperative game (element), the person who decides to not participate has no reason to feel better than those who do; as long as everyone has fun, who cares how they did it? And if anyone feels they gave up a piece of the plot to covet that stat, perhaps a bit of reevaluation is in order.
Plus, I don't understand how people are leaping from "players' participation didn't matter in the timing of the mayor's defeat" and "we're not going to get prizes for fighting the mayor". On the contrary, they definitely kept track - see the numbers on the 1-player challengers list? I would be surprised if they didn't use this data.
I don't know where you think people are saying they are better for not fighting!!
I for one, am
not saying that. I do not know if it was timed or not, so I can't comment on the fact.
As to the data on the battledome list - in the LDP we got to fight Razul, but the points did
not go towards our plot points.
It is actually the people who done a lot of fighting telling
us (those who chose little or no fighting) that we didn't do our fair share.
IF it was timed, then fighting didn't matter, if it wasn't timed and fighting will give out points, then I suppose myself and others wont get as many points as others.
It really doesn't matter, either way. I chose to keep a fairly good battledome score rather than chance no other reward for the fighting.
I am
not gloating or saying it was a better choice. It was
my choice and I am sick of hearing people say that I didn't do my part in bringing down the Mayor.
Plots are for the individual to decide on what they want to do and I resent the implication that I gave up the plot.
I am proud of my stats - worked damn hard to get them there and I
choose what is good for me and I wont be
told that I am selfish.