.:Requiem:.Glorious DevastationIt fits. It doesn't give me the "wow, this is a great subtext" vibe I get from you a lot, but it does work. Glorious isn't a word I'd use to describe a house/barn/whatever burning down, but I get your point. All in all, it's good. A strong showing for the first round.
7/10 Anubis Memories AflameI like this one. The best subtexts, in my opinion, are subtexts that interpret things as not as obvious as they seem. For example, a subtext for this could be "Look. It's a house. It's on fire. Schamazing." But this one makes you think- maybe it's not really a house. It's a metaphorical house. Metaphors in subtexts = good. I don't know if that's what you were going for, but it's what I interpreted at. If none of that made sense, please forgive me. I'm horribly (and painfully) "ill" at the moment, so I'm doing the best I can to be clear. However, a huge flaw I see with this is that you use the memory concept- after someone else already did (Dragonfire).
7.5/10Blk Mage Lost Admidst the ChaosThis isn't my favorite one, to be honest. This signature, to me, doesn't portray any feeling of lostness. You're right up there with the action of the destruction, not lost. However, props (Props? God, I've been using too much Xanga lately) for using the word chaos. It fits better for me than a generic word like destruction or "boom! smash!".
6.5/10Divine Halloween draws nigh...This isn't my favorite, either. The signature to me doesn't even give me the slighest feeling of Halloween, and you're making too many assumptions. The eerie feeling you may feel on Halloween night is definitely present, but Halloween itself is not. Not much else to say.
5.5/10Dragonfire Memories Lost ForeverI think this one honestly had the potential to be magnificent, but was followed through not-so-magnificently. I know where you're coming from with the memories take, but you have to go with something visual in the signature in order for it to completely make sense. For example, in Liv's subtext, which follows the same basis of yours, she says "memories
aflame", tying in the visual aspects of the signature to the metaphorical ones. Great for the first round though, and a very original idea.
8.5/10maniac Silly you, not entering a subtext!moogie Death Lives HereI like this one. I've always been a fan of the phrase "death lives" because it's just so silly and contradictory. It fits great here. There's obviously a lot of destruction, and death is usually a side effect of destruction so... no complaints here.
8.5/10paperfacesX022 Breaking the Darkness
Losing the LivesExcellent. I'm glad you didn't go with a fade, because I think it would look better without one. This subtext is very impressive in my opinion. It represents the complete spectrum of visual aspects (breaking the darkness) to ones not shown in the signature (losing the lives). Great job.
9.5/10pipsqueeek Lanterns of HavocI think this one is really good. Lanterns and havoc are both really great and visually inspiring words that convey the exact feeling of the signature. Great wording, nice length. It's all good.
9/10Pixa Engulfed in an amber eruptionAmber is a really good word, as well as eruption and engulfed. Amber is definitely not a word that first comes to mind when you look at this signature, so this lets me know you took some time to think about what you wanted to say. It definitely paid off, and you have a good, well rounded subtext. Partial alliteration definitely helps you as well.
8.5/10Skynetmain Blazing through the nightThis subtext reminds me a lot of Requiem's- it fits the signature fine, but it doesn't give you that "wow, this is incredible" feeling. Blazing is a great word however, instead of using something more boring and obvious such as 'burning' or something similar. Good job, and a good start, but it could be better.
7/10StephanieSilly you, not entering a subtext! susannahmio Dedication to DestructionAlliteration is always really good to have in a subtext, as well as many other literature devices (metaphors, similies, etc), so that's good that you used it. However, fire to me doesn't seem very dedicated. It burns until there's nothing left to burn, and then it just fizzes out and dies. Destruction isn't the best word that could be used, either- I think it would sound better if it was "dedication to devastation" or something along the lines of that. Not bad, though.
7/10theonlysaneone Silly you, not entering a subtext!Twizzler0171 Flaming Fury *Fade* Blazing BeautyLike I said with the previous subtext (not including theonlysaneone), alliteration is really good to have, and I like how you used that. I don't normally suggest fading, but this is an occasion where it could work, so good job for using it wisely. Blazing is a good word, as I said for Skynetmain (I don't think you copied it... it's not too uncommon). Nice job.
8/10WIS Admist the dark of midnight gloom *fade* Buds of amber flames shall bloomThis subtext seems too fancy for this signature. You see a barn/house/whatever burning down, and this signature is just... fancy. A subtext should reflect the feel of the signature as well as the visuals, and this doesn't quite match the feel. However, the rhyme is a great touch, and I can tell you thought hard to come up with this. However, some points have to be deducted for the use of the word amber- it seems bit odd you would come up with it after Pixa did (and it's a rather original word).
7/10 YesItIshDestruction AblazeThis subtext is iffy to me because it doesn't feel very interesting or unique. It describes what's going on in the signature... but it doesn't portray anything other than that, and the words are not as unique as they could be. It's just okay for me.
6.5/10
I'm sorry if I was more vague than I should have been, but as I said before, I'm really not feeling great at the moment and I'm not sure how much better it's going to get in the next few days, so I just wanted to finish these.