supRNurs wrote:
supRNurs wrote:
A user on the neoboards is claiming to have found a 13th parchment titled "Parchment Puzzler" and appears to be looking for others who have found it as well, to help him figure it out.
http://www.neopets.com/neoboards/topic. ... 930&next=1I first saw him post yesterday. Could be attention seeking, but doesn't hang around long enough for much attention. Posting from old, established acount too. Said he doesn't want to share how to get it just yet, in case this plot is a race like the former ones.
Meh... something else to keep an eye on...
Edit: Forgot to say that today he seems to have changed his mind about it being a clue:
Quote:
Yeah. I think its a red-herring though. If you don't know what it is, then you haven't found it. I'm going to tell everybody on the board what it is if when the next clue is released it doesn't help me get ahead. That's unless someone else who has found it neomails me.
A little more info:
Quote:
I'm hoping to work with someone who has found it to get further on in the plot before everyone else finds out about it. I won't be compensated for missing out on the first prize if I tell everyone.
Quote:
Btw, its not like the other parchments. It doesn't have thirteen dots on it, it has all twelve. You'll understand when you find it.
Quote:
I didn't find it in the tomb.
Because the neoboard is liable to splode, and I want a record of what he's said so far, here's a little more
Quote:
It's really hard because I don't want to give too much information away because you will get it straight away, or be on the right track. All I have to say is ONE word and you will have it in minutes. I know one person has found it, but I lost their username.
When asked, "Did you "stumble" across this new clue or had you been looking for it?" He replied, "You have to look for it" " you can't just find it."
Quote:
It's a easy clue that anyone could find if they knew where to look.
Sounds almost like he found an URL extension or something hidden in source. He was actually asked if he found it in source code, and ignored that question, while answering others.