Medusa wrote:
Neopets is a game. Perhaps there is no real reason to be complaining at all?
PPT is an Internet forum. Perhaps there is no real reason to be complaining at all?
:shrug:
Quote:
TNT is basically just attempting one big balancing act because whatever they are going to do there is always going to be a group of people complaining.
Right, but that doesn't mean anything goes.
I mean, if Neopets deleted everyone's accounts tomorrow, would you say, "Oh, well, there's always going to be people complaining whatever they do, so who cares?" Of course not.
Quote:
I think TNT do a good job considering the circumstances. They do recognise that not everyone is good at games and so instead of putting all the "hard" avatars as games they give those people an avenue to earn some avatars as well.
I've already explained that I'm not saying that every avatar should be a clickable. Nor do I think that every avatar should be a game avatar. What I think is that TNT should watch what they're inflating and refrain of inflating items like PBs, Draiks, and Krawks which were in my opinion, too expensive to begin with, which many people want, and which many people could barely hope to attain to begin with.
I don't care about random food or beauty or whatever items getting inflated, especially if they don't end up so expensive that people who REALLY want the item can't afford it any more.
When people who have always wanted a certain pet can't afford it anymore, or are going to have to save for many additional months to get one, that I care about.
Yes, TNT can't make everyone happy, but:
1) There are probably a lot more people who want a Draik, are saving for a Draik, or who already have a Draik and want more -- IE, people who are upset over further Draik inflation -- than people who already have a Draik, don't want more, and would be deeply upset over getting an avatar that didn't require a Draik.
2) I suspect having a dream pet pushed further out of reach is probably more upsetting to those who want the pet than a non-pet-ownership avatar is for those who own the pet (and care).
When you're dealing with a situation that is going to make people upset no matter what you do, the proper thing to do is generally to take the course of action that is going to make the fewest people least upset. In this case, that would have meant refraining from making an avatar that was almost guarenteed to make a very expensive pet many people want even more expensive.
Instead TNT decided they wanted to make lots of people upset for the sake of giving mild pleasure to the rich few who actually care.
Way to go, TNT.