Wed Jun 30, 2004 9:03 pm
The Boycott probably won't work. I suggest a mass quit.
On 3rd July, millions abandon their pets and self-freeze their accounts.
It'd be cool.
Wed Jun 30, 2004 9:37 pm
Amethyst wrote:Still, TNT really needs to pick it up. One thing that's REALLY bothering me is the TCG tournament. The staff is sitting around playing a CARD GAME when they could be fixing some of the glitches, or maybe answering user e-mails. And do we get anything out of this? I wouldn't mind so much if we could place bets on who would win, or if the users were involved somehow. But no! It's just an oppertunity for them to add more to the news page.
Wed Jun 30, 2004 10:13 pm
Moogum wrote:bgryph wrote:I suspect Neopets would be a lot more motivated to fix glitches and provide better customer service if failure to do so impacted them -- in terms of risk to potential sponsor support -- then when failure to do so only impacts users.
Sure, glitches happen. But they don't have to happen like they happen on Neopets. Your bank glitched away any of your money recently, then refused to return it to you? I didn't think so.
First, you can't say "they'd be a lot more motivated to fix glitches" because, well, the FIX the glitches. It's not like there's a glitch and they're like "hmm... well, we'll get to that in a bit let's go make a deal with Disney first". They see a glitch, and the programmers fix it, thats just how it works.
And about giving back items, do you REALLY think it's that easy? Can you just think of how many e-mails they already get, how many more they'll get of people wanting money back, how many they will get from people who wnat to take advantage and say their items were lost. Then they have to go through records to make sure that the people aren't lying, and then give them their items back. Can you imagine how much time and work that would take? It would distract them from their regular job of keeping the site up, and even more glitches would happen.
Oh and be realistic: comparing a bank to Neopets that way is a little out there.
Wed Jun 30, 2004 11:50 pm
They might instead be able to use some sort of system that tracks items over a certain value and makes sure they don't just vanish. Neither would be particularly trivial to implement.
My point is that shuffling mass quantities of numbers about online without glitching them up in the process isn't as impossible as some people here have suggested. Nor is having customer service people on hand to answer email queries -- sometimes stupid ones -- from a large customer base. Banks do it every day.
Thu Jul 01, 2004 3:23 am
Thu Jul 01, 2004 5:17 am
sailor_melody wrote:No they don't. I've dealt with banks. Once they have your money, customer service pretty much goes out the window. I swear they tell their employees to act stupid. Insolence you can punish, but you can't do anything about ignorance or stupidity.
Thu Jul 01, 2004 5:42 am
Thu Jul 01, 2004 2:39 pm
bgryph wrote:Oh and be realistic: comparing a bank to Neopets that way is a little out there.
Why? It's not like banks use special "bank computers" that only banks can own, or have special "bank customer service" that is far more efficent than customer service representatives available to Neopets. They use the same equipment and probably the same servers that Neopets does, they just have a much more robust system for moving money about (and, one hopes, better records as well -- though from my dealings with my bank I'm inclined to doubt it). And they undoubtedly hire the same customer service people -- only more of them.
My point is that shuffling mass quantities of numbers about online without glitching them up in the process isn't as impossible as some people here have suggested. Nor is having customer service people on hand to answer email queries -- sometimes stupid ones -- from a large customer base. Banks do it every day. So does just about any large online business that deals in real-life financial transactions. You just have to care enough about avoiding errors to take the necessary precautions, and of course have the necessary resources. By all accounts Neopets is doing pretty well financially, so that leaves motivation. :shrug:
Thu Jul 01, 2004 2:44 pm
Thu Jul 01, 2004 2:57 pm
Thu Jul 01, 2004 3:13 pm
Fri Jul 02, 2004 12:34 pm
VirtualMetal wrote:Go to http://www.pinkpt.com and scroll down a bit. Yukios post is about "The day of action" read that.
Fri Jul 02, 2004 5:13 pm
Kariiau wrote:VirtualMetal wrote:Go to http://www.pinkpt.com and scroll down a bit. Yukios post is about "The day of action" read that.
All I see is:
-The dissapearing ski lodge in Terror Mountain x2
-6 crossword answers
-New and updated content
-Deserted Fairground scratchcards prizes
-Muffin cooking pot recipies
Has it been deleted or something?
Fri Jul 02, 2004 5:53 pm
Fri Jul 02, 2004 6:03 pm
Mystique wrote:Loopylauren, i think some of what you say are totally uncalled for. the ultimate objective of this campaign is not to make TNT lose their money source, the sponsors. even though this campaign probably won't achieve anything at all, i believe Dana's objective is to make TNT review their actions and ultimately make neopets a better place for everyone. btw, i don't believe an eight yr old would do something that invite so much controversy as it takes some guts to initiate something like that. if you do not understand the objective of these players, then like many others, you are truely ignorant.