Wed Jun 30, 2004 12:04 am
tonu_revived wrote:I agree with both sides of the day of action, because they both have a point... So I posted a 3-Posted message on that board! Lets hope I get some reasonable responces... but I doubt it...
Wed Jun 30, 2004 12:57 am
Wed Jun 30, 2004 1:02 am
Note that anything which appears on PPT does not solely exemplify the thoughts of either myself or the staff. Anything which appears on PPT does not encompass the aim to 'idolize' nor 'bash' Neopets and their staff. These postings are the views, thoughts and opinions of the neopian populace.
Wed Jun 30, 2004 1:06 am
atomicblonde wrote:The most important part of the article always gets overlooked....Note that anything which appears on PPT does not solely exemplify the thoughts of either myself or the staff. Anything which appears on PPT does not encompass the aim to 'idolize' nor 'bash' Neopets and their staff. These postings are the views, thoughts and opinions of the neopian populace.
I'm sure that if an 'Up with TNT' article was sent in, it would have the same opportunity to be posted.
Wed Jun 30, 2004 1:09 am
Moogum wrote:Personally I think that it's stupid. Sponsers = free site. Glitches = inevitable on a website. Try to think of how many glitches go unnoticed because they fix them. Just because being a computer programer is their job, does not mean that there aren't going to be any problems along the way.
It's not bad customer service. With so many people on the site, and so many clueless new members e-mailing them every minute about everything, I can understand why lots of e-mails sent to them go un noticed.
Wed Jun 30, 2004 1:15 am
Wed Jun 30, 2004 1:24 am
raudf wrote:when you put the Sponsors as a higher priority than fixing the glitches..
It's annoying when they creat ed the auto forms to take the load off the email system, but in this case, it's a complete failure, given that it appears that they aren't even reading them! You don't get an autoresponse in most cases and when you do, it's lost in the system.
Sure it doesn't come directly from our pockets,
Wed Jun 30, 2004 1:25 am
raudf wrote:Moogum wrote:Personally I think that it's stupid. Sponsers = free site. Glitches = inevitable on a website. Try to think of how many glitches go unnoticed because they fix them. Just because being a computer programer is their job, does not mean that there aren't going to be any problems along the way.
It's not bad customer service. With so many people on the site, and so many clueless new members e-mailing them every minute about everything, I can understand why lots of e-mails sent to them go un noticed.
Hmmm... Glitches are inevitable, true. Sponsors are okay, but when you put the Sponsors as a higher priority than fixing the glitches.. that's when problems and complaints arise. As for customer service, lets just say, I fully disagree with your opinion, because it's not just "lots" but "truckloads". Especially for the frozen auto form.
It's annoying when they creat ed the auto forms to take the load off the email system, but in this case, it's a complete failure, given that it appears that they aren't even reading them! You don't get an autoresponse in most cases and when you do, it's lost in the system.
As for this Day of Action? It might work, or it might not. But as long as Neopets has Sponsors, the site isn't free, because we pay for it by looking at sites, signing up with things and *gasp* by playing the sponsors games. Sure it doesn't come directly from our pockets, but we do pay the sponsors, so... circle of life.
Wed Jun 30, 2004 1:28 am
It it's one thing I love about PPT is our ability to editorialize without censorship about neopets.
Wed Jun 30, 2004 1:40 am
Fishblade_Bluestream wrote: But that's not Neopets, is it? You buy a box of Cocoa Puffs because they're yummy sugar cereal, not 'cause they have a game on Neopets!
McDonald's was different, but I actually play with the plushies I got, and use the TCG cards in my deck!
So you're saying Neopets should be completely free? Well, if it was completely "free", ie. no RL merchandise WHATSOEVER, Neopets would go out of business.
Web sites, especially those as big and popular as Neopets, need bandwidth, expensive programs (Hey, Flash costs $500), and repairs, and that costs money. Seriously, people, instead of protesting Neopets, why don't you help them a little by contributing some money! You even get a cute little plushie for your donation! And some of 'em talk! *brick*
We can still get to them about the problems and stuff. As long as many people do it, it's a surefire way to get TNT more active and helpful to their members. ^_^
Wed Jun 30, 2004 1:48 am
Wed Jun 30, 2004 1:51 am
raudf wrote:If it wasn't for the site, the toys and plushies would fail. *shrugs*
And about the huge amounts of glitches, take a look at posts here from around the Jun 12, 2004. Or simply run a search on the word Glitch in the general forum. It was bad.. and all it got in the news was a single small paragraph that didn't begin to cover the extent of the errors that occured. This is what spawned the Day of Action protest.
Wed Jun 30, 2004 2:07 am
Phibby wrote:raudf wrote:If it wasn't for the site, the toys and plushies would fail. *shrugs*
Maybe overall they would fail, but without the site, I know I would still buy the plushies as long as they stayed the same in quality.Perhaps it's just that I'm a sucker for stuffed animals in general, but I don't buy the plushies for the site, I buy them just because I consider them to be cute and good toys.
Well, sure, it's been established that there have been glitches recently and Neo usually doesn't post about them, but how does not mentioning them in the news equal them not fixing the glitches in favor of interacting with sponsers? As far as I know, the sponsers have nothing to do with glitches at all. I'm with you in that I think Neo should explain about the glitches more (posting about it in the news, trying to get everyone to understand exactly what happened and that it's being dealt with as best as they can), but I'm not sure about how that has anything to do with sponsers...
Wed Jun 30, 2004 2:17 am
Wed Jun 30, 2004 2:30 am