WW6 Commentary Excess (Jan. 14-16)

Mon Jan 17, 2005 3:03 am

If I suspect that everyone is evil, and then someone evil dies, I'm right. So in that sense, it works. You just happen to ignore when you're wrong, that's all.

Last edited by lackadazed on Mon Jan 17, 2005 3:04 am, edited 1 time in total.

Mon Jan 17, 2005 3:04 am

the_dog_god wrote:Oh and I love this...

Kid posts

I do not get it, why are all of you guys voteing me out?

Then after he realises he should be pretending to be an innocent still...

Good thing we killed a warewolf!

Just put down your lead pipe and die in peace Kidwaiy...

First of all, quit acting like a know-it-all. It's getting old.

Next, I was extremely happy when a Werewolf or another bad guy died. That meant that there would be one less person making unknown deaths other than myself. Kidwaiy could actually be an innocent saying that. How would you know? It doesn't exactly make him bad by saying that.

24 Werewolf games and you didn't think of what I just said eh? Play some more.

Mon Jan 17, 2005 3:07 am

I've only played in *counts* 14 of the combined 30 games

The general rule of thumb is that when somebody posts something like "thanks to whoever protected me, it wasn't me I swear" it means they're a baddy that protected themselves. Only twice have I seen somebody say that truthfully. And when that happened it turned out the person protected turned out to be a baddy that ended up winning the game due to being undreamable and converting 6 powerful roles.

EDIT : Well done Tonu, you stopped a dreamer from dreaming when they might have been dreaming about somebody else entirely. You did it to prove your innocence when it would have been proved anyway. Nice going </sarcasm>

Mon Jan 17, 2005 3:11 am

the_dog_god wrote: The general rule of thumb is that when somebody posts something like "thanks to whoever protected me, it wasn't me I swear" it means they're a baddy that protected themselves. .

I bolded general for a reason. General meaning usually. How about if this isn't one of the times? I for one don't know if Kidwaiy is evil but there is a possibility that he isn't. What about the other players? Like jellyoflight?

Mon Jan 17, 2005 3:12 am

Well in 14 out of 14 games the player has been evil I'm fairly sure the odds are in my favour

And exactly what can Raze dream of ??

Mon Jan 17, 2005 3:13 am

the_dog_god wrote:Well in 14 out of 14 games the player has been evil I'm fairly sure the odds are in my favour

Says you.

Mon Jan 17, 2005 3:14 am

Mmm, Tinkerdwarf... what a great game, despite slightly less surprising ending... by the way, had I not been killed, and another baddie was tonight.. I'd have been upset, because it needs to be hopeless for the innocents for a win.

Kidwaiy's your last evil sibling, or he wouldn't have saved himself. Which he did, and if I'm wrong there... I dunno. Maybe I'll eat my hat. If I had a hat.

And there's two evil ancients left, just kill off everyone uncleared in side b. Or everyone in side b would be fine. Normally, I'd be all for baddies winning... but kidwaiy's annoying and the ancients killed me stupidly.

Mon Jan 17, 2005 3:18 am

unot wrote:Ask xjox about the time I stopped him from killing someone by putting him on top of the list.

*coughhercough*

But yes its true, I was stopped from killing on that night and I was not a happy bunny! :evil:

Mon Jan 17, 2005 3:21 am

Looks like I called this one right too and to think these people could have been dead a few nights ago. Now, I think we have at most two groups of baddies left: the ancients and a solo baddie that can prevent people from voting.

Mon Jan 17, 2005 3:22 am

cap wrote: Now, I think we have at most two groups of baddies left: the ancients and a solo baddie that can prevent people from voting.

Wow, that was a little specific. How did you know about the solo baddie which can prevent people from voting...if there actually is one.

Mon Jan 17, 2005 3:37 am

I'm making an assumption that there is someone called a jailor or something to that effect. Since the ancient we have found so far has the "corrupted" in front of the name I would think the one that prevents people from voting would be a solo baddies.

But that's just speculation.

Oh and we still have the evil sibling left so living, please lock kidawaiy tonight for sure.

Mon Jan 17, 2005 3:37 am

Maybe the innocents can still come from behind and win!!!

I hope...

Unot, you seem very hyper today... I can't imagine why though...

Mon Jan 17, 2005 3:41 am

cap wrote:I'm making an assumption that there is someone called a jailor or something to that effect. Since the ancient we have found so far has the "corrupted" in front of the name I would think the one that prevents people from voting would be a solo baddies.

And that took you only what like 15 minutes to think of that "speculation" after I had posted?

And it's pretty hard to believe your speculation anyway. But I'm not pointing fingers at anyone.

Mon Jan 17, 2005 3:43 am

You're assuming I spent my time on the forum after I posted, I did not Ammer.

Remember when Matt and The_dog_god couldn't vote? Someone had to do that. While Scott hasn't posted role sheets this time around I think it's better to assume the baddie is still out there.

Mon Jan 17, 2005 3:47 am

cap wrote:You're assuming I spent my time on the forum after I posted, I did not Ammer.

Remember when Matt and The_dog_god couldn't vote? Someone had to do that. While Scott hasn't posted role sheets this time around I think it's better to assume the baddie is still out there.

You have a point. Why couldn't you say that in the first place? Anyways, that's not my place to judge. But let's not stop this bickering now shall we? It's getting pointless.