hydruxo wrote:
skizzy the wonder lizard wrote:
when will TNT learn? either make CLEAR, CONCISE RULES or get rid of the freaking neoboards.
or even better, both.
It's in the Terms and Conditions.
Quote:
promotions offering prizes of any sort (including contests, raffles, lotteries, chain letters or any kind of giveaway)
[rant]Perhaps so, but they don't put these in the Chat Rules- They should update those or replace them with the actual Terms and Conditions. I was not actually aware that such a rule existed in the full TaC, which is why the Chat Rules MUST be updated or made more specific. Besides, isn't giving someone an item technically a giveaway anyway? Aren't PPT giveaways still giveaways? If that were the case, we should be in Iceland. Guilds host giveaways, raffles, et cetera all the time; in fact, I bet if you joined one of the most popular they'd still be giving random things away without so much as a cursory glance form the Staff, and the integrity of those giveaways is questionable to say the least. So why should this be any different?
If you ask me, it's a ridiculous rule, and not being in the Chat Rules, should not prohibit someone from posting or offering them there. If you're not going to allow giveaways, why even BOTHER with the "give item" feature?
I for one think it's a ridiculous rule to keep people from giving away free items if they feel like it. And, as the chat rules say, if "no one has ever hacked into Neopets, accessed user information, accounts or usernames", then why should anything be wrong with a giveaway? That would mean the user actually wants to host it and did not have their account compromised unless it was through a major mistake of their own.
Even if I were to do it through the money tree, it would still be a giveaway- what we are looking at here are rules that are, for the most part- clear cut, but in some cases fail miserably at being specific enough, contain too many loopholes, or cover too broad a spectrum of actions.
Thus, I am warned rightfully for a violation- BUT, if I am to be warned or frozen, I can safely say that the 299 people that received jelly, as well as anyone that has ever taken or put items into the Money Tree should be warned, perhaps frozen themselves. Oh, I know! Maybe we should freeze the staff, too, because they were the ones who offered the Money Tree in the first place! Is that a good idea? I don't think I need to answer that question for you. Bah! [/rant]